331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25732902)
1. Diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA for pancreatic solid lesions with conventional 22-gauge needle using the slow pull technique: a prospective study.
Kin T; Katanuma A; Yane K; Takahashi K; Osanai M; Takaki R; Matsumoto K; Gon K; Matsumori T; Tomonari A; Maguchi H; Shinohara T; Nojima M
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 50(7):900-7. PubMed ID: 25732902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Slow-pull and different conventional suction techniques in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid lesions using 22-gauge needles.
Chen JY; Ding QY; Lv Y; Guo W; Zhi FC; Liu SD; Cheng TM
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(39):8790-8797. PubMed ID: 27818594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses.
Nakai Y; Isayama H; Chang KJ; Yamamoto N; Hamada T; Uchino R; Mizuno S; Miyabayashi K; Yamamoto K; Kawakubo K; Kogure H; Sasaki T; Hirano K; Tanaka M; Tada M; Fukayama M; Koike K
Dig Dis Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(7):1578-85. PubMed ID: 24429514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High and low negative pressure suction techniques in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 25-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Kudo T; Kawakami H; Hayashi T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Inoue H; Katanuma A; Kawakubo K; Ishiwatari H; Doi S; Yamada R; Maguchi H; Isayama H; Mitsuhashi T; Sakamoto N;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1030-7.e1. PubMed ID: 24890422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of a stylet on a histological specimen in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 22-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Abe Y; Kawakami H; Oba K; Hayashi T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Isayama H; Ishiwatari H; Doi S; Nakashima M; Yamamoto N; Kuwatani M; Mitsuhashi T; Hasegawa T; Hirose Y; Yamada T; Tanaka M; Sakamoto N;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):837-844.e1. PubMed ID: 25936452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling by combined fine needle aspiration and trucut needle biopsy: a prospective study.
Wittmann J; Kocjan G; Sgouros SN; Deheragoda M; Pereira SP
Cytopathology; 2006 Feb; 17(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 16417562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions.
Iwashita T; Nakai Y; Samarasena JB; Park DH; Zhang Z; Gu M; Lee JG; Chang KJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):909-15. PubMed ID: 23433596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions using 20 Gauge Procore™ needle: A multicenter randomized trial.
Di Mitri R; Mocciaro F; Antonini F; Scimeca D; Conte E; Bonaccorso A; Scibetta N; Unti E; Fornelli A; Giorgini S; Binda C; Macarri G; Larghi A; Fabbri C
Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Feb; 52(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 31601535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for upper gastrointestinal submucosal or extraluminal solid mass lesions.
Rong L; Kida M; Yamauchi H; Okuwaki K; Miyazawa S; Iwai T; Kikuchi H; Watanabe M; Imaizumi H; Koizumi W
Dig Endosc; 2012 Sep; 24(5):358-63. PubMed ID: 22925290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective comparison of slow-pull and standard suction techniques of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic cancer.
Bor R; Vasas B; Fábián A; Bálint A; Farkas K; Milassin Á; Czakó L; Rutka M; Molnár T; Szűcs M; Tiszlavicz L; Kaizer L; Hamar S; Szepes Z
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):6. PubMed ID: 30626331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stylet slow-pull versus standard suction for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
Saxena P; El Zein M; Stevens T; Abdelgelil A; Besharati S; Messallam A; Kumbhari V; Azola A; Brainard J; Shin EJ; Lennon AM; Canto MI; Singh VK; Khashab MA
Endoscopy; 2018 May; 50(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 29272906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective evaluation of the optimal number of 25-gauge needle passes for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions in the absence of an onsite cytopathologist.
Suzuki R; Irisawa A; Bhutani MS; Hikichi T; Takagi T; Sato A; Sato M; Ikeda T; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Tasaki K; Obara K; Ohira H
Dig Endosc; 2012 Nov; 24(6):452-6. PubMed ID: 23078439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration versus core biopsy needle in the evaluation of solid pancreatic neoplasms.
Strand DS; Jeffus SK; Sauer BG; Wang AY; Stelow EB; Shami VM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Sep; 42(9):751-8. PubMed ID: 24550162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors based on the World Health Organization classification.
Unno J; Kanno A; Masamune A; Kasajima A; Fujishima F; Ishida K; Hamada S; Kume K; Kikuta K; Hirota M; Motoi F; Unno M; Shimosegawa T
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 49(11):1367-74. PubMed ID: 25180490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Newly Designed 21-Gauge and Standard 22-Gauge Aspiration Needles in Patients with Solid Pancreatic Masses.
Minaga K; Yoshikawa T; Yamashita Y; Akamatsu H; Ikenouchi M; Ishii T; Matsumoto H; Iwagami H; Nakatani Y; Hatamaru K; Takenaka M; Akamatsu T; Uenoyama Y; Watanabe T; Ono K; Chiba Y; Kudo M
Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Oct; 64(10):2982-2991. PubMed ID: 31011943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A pilot study of EUS-guided through-the-needle forceps biopsy (with video).
Nakai Y; Isayama H; Chang KJ; Yamamoto N; Mizuno S; Mohri D; Kogure H; Matsubara S; Tada M; Koike K
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jul; 84(1):158-62. PubMed ID: 26772889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The 25-gauge EUS-FNA needle: Good for on-site but poor for off-site evaluation? Results of a randomized trial.
Varadarajulu S; Bang JY; Holt BA; Hasan MK; Logue A; Hawes RH; Hebert-Magee S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1056-63. PubMed ID: 24973173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study.
Rodrigues-Pinto E; Jalaj S; Grimm IS; Baron TH
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 27345131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device.
van Riet PA; Larghi A; Attili F; Rindi G; Nguyen NQ; Ruszkiewicz A; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Aslanian H; Farrell J; Robert M; Adeniran A; Van Der Merwe S; Roskams T; Chang K; Lin F; Lee JG; Arcidiacono PG; Petrone M; Doglioni C; Iglesias-Garcia J; Abdulkader I; Giovannini M; Bories E; Poizat F; Santo E; Scapa E; Marmor S; Bucobo JC; Buscaglia JM; Heimann A; Wu M; Baldaque-Silva F; Moro CF; Erler NS; Biermann K; Poley JW; Cahen DL; Bruno MJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Feb; 89(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 30367877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
