144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25733196)
1. Developing best-practice Bayesian Belief Networks in ecological risk assessments for freshwater and estuarine ecosystems: a quantitative review.
McDonald KS; Ryder DS; Tighe M
J Environ Manage; 2015 May; 154():190-200. PubMed ID: 25733196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Integrating Bayesian Belief Networks in a toolbox for decision support on plastic clean-up technologies in rivers and estuaries.
Leone G; Catarino AI; Pauwels I; Mani T; Tishler M; Egger M; Forio MAE; Goethals PLM; Everaert G
Environ Pollut; 2022 Mar; 296():118721. PubMed ID: 34952180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk of fire occurrence in arid and semi-arid ecosystems of Iran: an investigation using Bayesian belief networks.
Bashari H; Naghipour AA; Khajeddin SJ; Sangoony H; Tahmasebi P
Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Sep; 188(9):531. PubMed ID: 27553945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Integration of weather conditions for predicting microbial water quality using Bayesian Belief Networks.
Panidhapu A; Li Z; Aliashrafi A; Peleato NM
Water Res; 2020 Mar; 170():115349. PubMed ID: 31830650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical applications of Bayesian belief networks in pathology.
Hamilton PW; Montironi R; Abmayr W; Bibbo M; Anderson N; Thompson D; Bartels PH
Pathologica; 1995 Jun; 87(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 8570284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Bayesian belief network approach for assessing uncertainty in conceptual site models at contaminated sites.
Thomsen NI; Binning PJ; McKnight US; Tuxen N; Bjerg PL; Troldborg M
J Contam Hydrol; 2016 May; 188():12-28. PubMed ID: 26950254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A study of anthropogenic and climatic disturbance of the New River Estuary using a Bayesian belief network.
Nojavan A F; Qian SS; Paerl HW; Reckhow KH; Albright EA
Mar Pollut Bull; 2014 Jun; 83(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 24814252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fully connected Bayesian belief networks: a modeling procedure with a case study of the Ganges river basin.
Varis O; Rahaman MM; Kajander T
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Jul; 8(3):491-502. PubMed ID: 21591248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metal bioavailability in ecological risk assessment of freshwater ecosystems: From science to environmental management.
Väänänen K; Leppänen MT; Chen X; Akkanen J
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2018 Jan; 147():430-446. PubMed ID: 28888793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Towards a general framework for the assessment of interactive effects of multiple stressors on aquatic ecosystems: Results from the Making Aquatic Ecosystems Great Again (MAEGA) workshop.
Van den Brink PJ; Bracewell SA; Bush A; Chariton A; Choung CB; Compson ZG; Dafforn KA; Korbel K; Lapen DR; Mayer-Pinto M; Monk WA; O'Brien AL; Rideout NK; Schäfer RB; Sumon KA; Verdonschot RCM; Baird DJ
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Sep; 684():722-726. PubMed ID: 30857726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The science-policy interface of risk-based freshwater and marine management systems: From concepts to practical tools.
Cormier R; Stelzenmüller V; Creed IF; Igras J; Rambo H; Callies U; Johnson LB
J Environ Manage; 2018 Nov; 226():340-346. PubMed ID: 30130703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An ecosystem service approach to support integrated pond management: a case study using Bayesian belief networks--highlighting opportunities and risks.
Landuyt D; Lemmens P; D'hondt R; Broekx S; Liekens I; De Bie T; Declerck SA; De Meester L; Goethals PL
J Environ Manage; 2014 Dec; 145():79-87. PubMed ID: 25005053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of multivariate probabilistic (Bayesian) networks to substance use disorder risk stratification and cost estimation.
Weinstein L; Radano TA; Jack T; Kalina P; Eberhardt JS
Perspect Health Inf Manag; 2009 Sep; 6(Fall):1b. PubMed ID: 20169014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Strengths and weaknesses of Monte Carlo simulation models and Bayesian belief networks in microbial risk assessment.
Smid JH; Verloo D; Barker GC; Havelaar AH
Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 May; 139 Suppl 1():S57-63. PubMed ID: 20071046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting the likely response of data-poor ecosystems to climate change using space-for-time substitution across domains.
Lester RE; Close PG; Barton JL; Pope AJ; Brown SC
Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Nov; 20(11):3471-81. PubMed ID: 24832685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Management of uncertainty in breast cancer grading with Bayesian belief networks.
Kronqvist P; Montironi R; Collan YU; Bartels PH; Thompson D
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1995 Oct; 17(5):300-8. PubMed ID: 8534332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting island biosecurity risk from introduced fauna using Bayesian Belief Networks.
Lohr C; Wenger A; Woodberry O; Pressey RL; Morris K
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 601-602():1173-1181. PubMed ID: 28605835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: A global assessment.
Camargo JA; Alonso A
Environ Int; 2006 Aug; 32(6):831-49. PubMed ID: 16781774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subjective breast cancer grading. Analyses of reproducibility after application of Bayesian belief networks.
Kronqvist P; Montironi R; Kuopio T; Collan YU
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Oct; 19(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 9349902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Time-dependent estimates of recurrence and survival in colon cancer: clinical decision support system tool development for adjuvant therapy and oncological outcome assessment.
Steele SR; Bilchik A; Johnson EK; Nissan A; Peoples GE; Eberhardt JS; Kalina P; Petersen B; Brücher B; Protic M; Avital I; Stojadinovic A
Am Surg; 2014 May; 80(5):441-53. PubMed ID: 24887722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
