141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25733297)
1. Re: Sener et al.: asymptomatic lower pole small renal stones: shock wave lithotripsy, flexible ureteroscopy, or observation? A prospective randomized trial (Urology 2015;85:33-37).
Karatag T; Buldu I; Istanbulluoglu MO
Urology; 2015 Mar; 85(3):709. PubMed ID: 25733297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Asymptomatic lower pole small renal stones: shock wave lithotripsy, flexible ureteroscopy, or observation? A prospective randomized trial.
Sener NC; Bas O; Sener E; Zengin K; Ozturk U; Altunkol A; Evliyaoglu Y
Urology; 2015 Jan; 85(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 25440816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reply by the authors.
Sener NC; Bas O; Sener E; Zengin K; Ozturk U; Altunkol A; Evliyaoglu Y
Urology; 2015 Mar; 85(3):710. PubMed ID: 25733299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Controversy on lower pole stones: monitor or intervene?].
Häcker A; Michel MS
Urologe A; 2012 Mar; 51(3):368-71. PubMed ID: 22350016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment selection for urolithiasis: percutaneous nephrolithomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and active monitoring.
Desai M; Sun Y; Buchholz N; Fuller A; Matsuda T; Matlaga B; Miller N; Bolton D; Alomar M; Ganpule A
World J Urol; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1395-1399. PubMed ID: 28303335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient decision making for asymptomatic renal calculi: balancing benefit and risk.
Sarkissian C; Noble M; Li J; Monga M
Urology; 2013 Feb; 81(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 23374767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Re: prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones smaller than 1 cm.
Assimos DG
J Urol; 2014 Jun; 191(6):1812-3. PubMed ID: 25280292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less.
Pearle MS; Lingeman JE; Leveillee R; Kuo R; Preminger GM; Nadler RB; Macaluso J; Monga M; Kumar U; Dushinski J; Albala DM; Wolf JS; Assimos D; Fabrizio M; Munch LC; Nakada SY; Auge B; Honey J; Ogan K; Pattaras J; McDougall EM; Averch TD; Turk T; Pietrow P; Watkins S
J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):2005-9. PubMed ID: 15879805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Commentary on shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi.
Schenkman NS
J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5 Suppl):S74. PubMed ID: 18405760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Yuri P; Hariwibowo R; Soeroharjo I; Danarto R; Hendri AZ; Brodjonegoro SR; Rasyid N; Birowo P; Widyahening IS
Acta Med Indones; 2018 Jan; 50(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 29686172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Management options for lower pole renal calculi.
Raman JD; Pearle MS
Curr Opin Urol; 2008 Mar; 18(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18303547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What happens to asymptomatic lower pole kidney stones smaller than 10 mm in children during watchful waiting?
Telli O; Hamidi N; Bagci U; Demirbas A; Hascicek AM; Soygur T; Burgu B
Pediatr Nephrol; 2017 May; 32(5):853-857. PubMed ID: 28070668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective, randomized trial of management for asymptomatic lower pole calculi.
Yuruk E; Binbay M; Sari E; Akman T; Altinyay E; Baykal M; Muslumanoglu AY; Tefekli A
J Urol; 2010 Apr; 183(4):1424-8. PubMed ID: 20172565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Re: Impact of pelvicalyceal anatomy in treatment with shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy of lower pole renal stones.
Sener NC; Imamoglu A; Bas O; Ozturk U; Goktug G; Tuygun C; Bakirtas H
Urolithiasis; 2014 Dec; 42(6):559. PubMed ID: 25113392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of combining flexible and rigid ureteroscopy for transurethral lithotripsy.
Shigemura K; Yasufuku T; Yamashita M; Arakawa S; Fujisawa M
Kobe J Med Sci; 2010 Aug; 56(1):E24-8. PubMed ID: 21063143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Asymptomatic kidney stones: active surveillance vs. treatment].
Neisius A; Thomas C; Roos FC; Hampel C; Fritsche HM; Bach T; Thüroff JW; Knoll T
Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Sep; 46(5):391-4. PubMed ID: 26378390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative factors predicting spontaneous clearance of residual stone fragments after flexible ureteroscopy.
Ito H; Kuroda S; Kawahara T; Makiyama K; Yao M; Matsuzaki J
Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 25599830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shock wave lithotripsy or retrograde intrarenal surgery: which one is more effective for 10-20-mm renal stones in children.
Ergin G; Kirac M; Kopru B; Ebiloglu T; Kibar Y; Biri H
Ir J Med Sci; 2018 Nov; 187(4):1121-1126. PubMed ID: 29502272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy.
Preminger GM
Urol Res; 2006 Apr; 34(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 16463145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes of long-term follow-up of asymptomatic renal stones and prediction of stone-related events.
Li X; Zhu W; Lam W; Yue Y; Duan H; Zeng G
BJU Int; 2019 Mar; 123(3):485-492. PubMed ID: 30253029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
