146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25733408)
1. Amputee socks: Sock thickness changes with normal use.
Cagle JC; D'Silva KJ; Hafner BJ; Harrison DS; Sanders JE
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Jun; 40(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 25733408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Amputee socks: thickness of multiple socks.
Cagle JC; Yu AJ; Ciol MA; Sanders JE
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Oct; 38(5):405-12. PubMed ID: 24240023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Self-reported prosthetic sock use among persons with transtibial amputation.
D'Silva K; Hafner BJ; Allyn KJ; Sanders JE
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Aug; 38(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 23986464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Amputee socks: how does sock ply relate to sock thickness?
Sanders JE; Cagle JC; Harrison DS; Karchin A
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Mar; 36(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 22228614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Device to monitor sock use in people using prosthetic limbs: technical report.
Sanders JE; Murthy R; Cagle JC; Allyn KJ; Phillips RH; Otis BP
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(8):1229-38. PubMed ID: 23341315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Residual limb fluid volume change and volume accommodation: Relationships to activity and self-report outcomes in people with trans-tibial amputation.
Sanders JE; Youngblood RT; Hafner BJ; Ciol MA; Allyn KJ; Gardner D; Cagle JC; Redd CB; Dietrich CR
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Aug; 42(4):415-427. PubMed ID: 29402170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How do sock ply changes affect residual-limb fluid volume in people with transtibial amputation?
Sanders JE; Harrison DS; Allyn KJ; Myers TR; Ciol MA; Tsai EC
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(2):241-56. PubMed ID: 22773526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An Inductive Sensing System to Measure In-Socket Residual Limb Displacements for People Using Lower-Limb Prostheses.
Henrikson KM; Weathersby EJ; Larsen BG; Cagle JC; McLean JB; Sanders JE
Sensors (Basel); 2018 Nov; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 30423932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of activity intensity, time, and intermittent doffing on daily limb fluid volume change in people with transtibial amputation.
Youngblood RT; Hafner BJ; Allyn KJ; Cagle JC; Hinrichs P; Redd C; Vamos AC; Ciol MA; Bean N; Sanders JE
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Feb; 43(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 30010494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility testing of a novel prosthetic socket sensor system.
Rich TL; Voss G; Fairhurst S; Matsumoto M; Brielmaier S; Koester K; Netoff TI; Hansen AH; Ferguson JE
Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Jul; 45(14):2374-2381. PubMed ID: 35797711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short partial doffs of release/relock sockets may effectively stabilize limb fluid volume in prosthesis users with transtibial amputation.
Lanahan CR; Coburn KA; Hafner BJ; Ballesteros D; Allyn KJ; Friedly JL; Ciol MA; Carter RV; Mertens JC; Krout AJ; Sanders JE
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2023 Jun; 106():105986. PubMed ID: 37210769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An adaptive prosthetic socket for people with transtibial amputation.
Sanders JE; Vamos AC; Mertens JC; Allyn KJ; Larsen BG; Ballesteros D; Wang H; DeGrasse NS; Garbini JL; Hafner BJ; Friedly JL
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):11168. PubMed ID: 38750086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adjustable sockets may improve residual limb fluid volume retention in transtibial prosthesis users.
Brzostowski JT; Larsen BG; Youngblood RT; Ciol MA; Hafner BJ; Gurrey CJ; McLean JB; Allyn KJ; Sanders JE
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Jun; 43(3):250-256. PubMed ID: 30628522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using magnetic panels to enlarge a transtibial prosthetic socket.
Coburn KA; DeGrasse NS; Allyn KJ; Larsen BG; Garbini JL; Sanders JE
Med Eng Phys; 2022 Dec; 110():103924. PubMed ID: 36564131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of elevated vacuum and suction prosthetic suspension systems in managing daily residual limb fluid volume change in people with transtibial amputation.
Youngblood RT; Brzostowski JT; Hafner BJ; Czerniecki JM; Allyn KJ; Foster RL; Sanders JE
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Jun; 44(3):155-163. PubMed ID: 32186238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transtibial prosthetic socket pistoning: static evaluation of Seal-In(®) X5 and Dermo(®) Liner using motion analysis system.
Gholizadeh H; Osman NA; Kamyab M; Eshraghi A; Abas WA; Azam MN
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 21794965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic review of effects of current transtibial prosthetic socket designs-Part 1: Qualitative outcomes.
Safari MR; Meier MR
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(5):491-508. PubMed ID: 26436666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laboratory and clinical tests of a prototype pressure sensor for clincial assessment of prosthetic socket fit.
Polliack AA; Craig DD; Sieh RC; Landsberger S; Mcneal DR
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2002 Apr; 26(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 12043923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The development of a rapid prototyping prosthetic socket coated with a resin layer for transtibial amputees.
Hsu LH; Huang GF; Lu CT; Hong DY; Liu SH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Mar; 34(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 19947824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preliminary experiences with the CIR casting system for transtibial prosthetic sockets.
Thanh NH; Poetsma PA; Jensen JS
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Jun; 33(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 19367516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
