These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. Videofluoroscopic evaluation of prosthetic fit and residual limbs following transtibial amputation. Bocobo CR; Castellote JM; MacKinnon D; Gabrielle-Bergman A J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jan; 35(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 9505248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Finite element modeling of the contact interface between trans-tibial residual limb and prosthetic socket. Lee WC; Zhang M; Jia X; Cheung JT Med Eng Phys; 2004 Oct; 26(8):655-62. PubMed ID: 15471693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evaluating shear and normal force with the use of an instrumented transtibial socket: A case study. Lenz AL; Bush TR Med Eng Phys; 2019 Sep; 71():102-107. PubMed ID: 31331756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. CIR sand casting system for trans-tibial socket. Wu Y; Casanova H; Smith WK; Edwards M; Childress DS Prosthet Orthot Int; 2003 Aug; 27(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 14571945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Axial bone-socket displacement for persons with a traumatic transtibial amputation: The effect of elevated vacuum suspension at progressive body-weight loads. Darter BJ; Sinitski K; Wilken JM Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Oct; 40(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 26423107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Elastomeric liners for people with transtibial amputation: Survey of prosthetists' clinical practices. Hafner BJ; Cagle JC; Allyn KJ; Sanders JE Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Apr; 41(2):149-156. PubMed ID: 27613589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The aerodynamics of running socks: Reality or rhetoric? Ashford RL; White P; Indramohan V Foot (Edinb); 2011 Dec; 21(4):184-7. PubMed ID: 21856147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Validity of method to quantify transtibial amputees' free-living prosthetic wearing times and physical activity levels when using suction suspension sockets. Tang KT; Spence WD; Maxwell D; Stansfield BW J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(3):427-37. PubMed ID: 22773201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Instrumented socket inserts for sensing interaction at the limb-socket interface. Swanson EC; McLean JB; Allyn KJ; Redd CB; Sanders JE Med Eng Phys; 2018 Jan; 51():111-118. PubMed ID: 29229405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Interface Pressure System to Compare the Functional Performance of Prosthetic Sockets during the Gait in People with Trans-Tibial Amputation. Ibarra Aguila S; Sánchez GJ; Sauvain EE; Alemon B; Fuentes-Aguilar RQ; Huegel JC Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 33317006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Interface stress in socket/residual limb with transtibial prosthetic suspension systems during locomotion on slopes and stairs. Eshraghi A; Abu Osman NA; Gholizadeh H; Ali S; Abas WA Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Jan; 94(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 24919079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Walking in a vacuum-assisted socket shifts the stump fluid balance. Goswami J; Lynn R; Street G; Harlander M Prosthet Orthot Int; 2003 Aug; 27(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 14571940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Outcomes of a standardized surgical and rehabilitation program in transtibial amputation for peripheral vascular disease: a prospective cohort study. Johannesson A; Larsson GU; Ramstrand N; Lauge-Pedersen H; Wagner P; Atroshi I Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Apr; 89(4):293-303. PubMed ID: 20134308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Does actively enlarging socket volume during resting facilitate residual limb fluid volume recovery in trans-tibial prosthesis users? Larsen BG; McLean JB; Brzostowski JT; Carter R; Allyn KJ; Hafner BJ; Garbini JL; Sanders JE Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Aug; 78():105001. PubMed ID: 32619870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The impact a surgeon has on primary amputee prosthetic rehabilitation: A survey of residual lower limb quality. Sooriakumaran S; Uden M; Mulroy S; Ewins D; Collins T Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Aug; 42(4):428-436. PubMed ID: 29480094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Strength evaluation of prosthetic check sockets, copolymer sockets, and definitive laminated sockets. Gerschutz MJ; Haynes ML; Nixon D; Colvin JM J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(3):405-26. PubMed ID: 22773200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The modular socket system in a rural setting in Indonesia. Giesberts B; Ennion L; Hjelmstrom O; Karma A; Lechler K; Hekman E; Bergsma A Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Jun; 42(3):336-343. PubMed ID: 29153044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Interface pressures and shear stresses: sagittal plane angular alignment effects in three trans-tibial amputee case studies. Sanders JE; Daly CH Prosthet Orthot Int; 1999 Apr; 23(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 10355640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]