283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25733553)
21. A Cross-sectional Study of Knowledge, Attitude and Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening among Cancer Survivors.
Huang Y; Soon YY; Ngo LP; Dina Ee YH; Tai BC; Wong HC; Lee SC
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Jun; 20(6):1817-1824. PubMed ID: 31244305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Decision-making styles in the context of colorectal cancer screening.
Douma LN; Uiters E; Timmermans DRM
BMC Psychol; 2020 Feb; 8(1):11. PubMed ID: 32014059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Interventions to enhance informed choices among invitees of screening programmes-a systematic review.
van Agt HM; Korfage IJ; Essink-Bot ML
Eur J Public Health; 2014 Oct; 24(5):789-801. PubMed ID: 24443115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Provider perspectives on the utility of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for facilitating shared decision making.
Schroy PC; Mylvaganam S; Davidson P
Health Expect; 2014 Feb; 17(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 21902773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Colorectal cancer screening: Associations between information provision, attitudes and intended participation.
Brandhof SD; Fagerlin A; Hawley S; Toes-Zoutendijk E; Trevena L; McCaffery K; Korfage IJ
Patient Educ Couns; 2018 Mar; 101(3):546-550. PubMed ID: 28899711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and practices preferences for decision making.
Messina CR; Lane DS; Grimson R
Am J Prev Med; 2005 Jun; 28(5):439-46. PubMed ID: 15894147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy?
van Dam L; Korfage IJ; Kuipers EJ; Hol L; van Roon AH; Reijerink JC; van Ballegooijen M; van Leerdam ME
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Jul; 49(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 23571149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Analyzing paths from online health information seeking to colorectal cancer screening using health literacy skills frame and cognitive mediation model.
Jin SW; Lee Y; Dia DA
Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Mar; 102(3):416-423. PubMed ID: 30448041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. How narratives influence colorectal cancer screening decision making and uptake: A realist review.
Woudstra AJ; Suurmond J
Health Expect; 2019 Jun; 22(3):327-337. PubMed ID: 31025444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Decision-making about participation in colorectal cancer screening in Sweden: Autonomous, value-dependent but uninformed?
Wangmar J; Wengström Y; Jervaeus A; Hultcrantz R; Fritzell K
Patient Educ Couns; 2021 Apr; 104(4):919-926. PubMed ID: 32980202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Readability, suitability, and health content assessment of web-based patient education materials on colorectal cancer screening.
Tian C; Champlin S; Mackert M; Lazard A; Agrawal D
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):284-90. PubMed ID: 24674352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Colorectal cancer screening participation: a systematic review.
Wools A; Dapper EA; de Leeuw JR
Eur J Public Health; 2016 Feb; 26(1):158-68. PubMed ID: 26370437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Physician colorectal cancer screening recommendations: an examination based on informed decision making.
Wackerbarth SB; Tarasenko YN; Joyce JM; Haist SA
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Apr; 66(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 17098393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinician-patient-family decision-making and health literacy in adolescents and young adults with cancer and their families: A systematic review of qualitative studies.
Gessler D; Juraskova I; Sansom-Daly UM; Shepherd HL; Patterson P; Muscat DM
Psychooncology; 2019 Jul; 28(7):1408-1419. PubMed ID: 31108019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of health literacy on knowledge and receipt of colorectal cancer screening: a survey study.
Miller DP; Brownlee CD; McCoy TP; Pignone MP
BMC Fam Pract; 2007 Mar; 8():16. PubMed ID: 17394668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Investigation of a multimedia, computer-based approach to improve knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, and receptivity to cancer clinical trials among newly diagnosed patients with diverse health literacy skills.
Polite BN; Cipriano-Steffens TM; Liao C; Miller EL; Arndt NL; Hahn EA
Cancer; 2019 Jun; 125(12):2066-2075. PubMed ID: 30811591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Decision-making on colorectal cancer screening in Curaçao - interviews with the target population.
Blake SN; Hugtenburg JG; van der Vlugt M; Dekker E; Fransen MP
BMC Public Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):1437. PubMed ID: 37501171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Contrasts in Practices and Perceived Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening by Nurses and Physicians Working in Primary Care Settings in Oman.
Muliira JK; D'Souza MS; Ahmed SM
J Cancer Educ; 2016 Mar; 31(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 25739678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Does colorectal cancer risk perception predict screening behavior? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Atkinson TM; Salz T; Touza KK; Li Y; Hay JL
J Behav Med; 2015 Dec; 38(6):837-50. PubMed ID: 26280755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Empirical relationships between numeracy and treatment decision making: A scoping review of the literature.
Malloy-Weir LJ; Schwartz L; Yost J; McKibbon KA
Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Mar; 99(3):310-325. PubMed ID: 26519238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
