BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

727 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25733713)

  • 1. DNA2 drives processing and restart of reversed replication forks in human cells.
    Thangavel S; Berti M; Levikova M; Pinto C; Gomathinayagam S; Vujanovic M; Zellweger R; Moore H; Lee EH; Hendrickson EA; Cejka P; Stewart S; Lopes M; Vindigni A
    J Cell Biol; 2015 Mar; 208(5):545-62. PubMed ID: 25733713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Smarcal1-Mediated Fork Reversal Triggers Mre11-Dependent Degradation of Nascent DNA in the Absence of Brca2 and Stable Rad51 Nucleofilaments.
    Kolinjivadi AM; Sannino V; De Antoni A; Zadorozhny K; Kilkenny M; Técher H; Baldi G; Shen R; Ciccia A; Pellegrini L; Krejci L; Costanzo V
    Mol Cell; 2017 Sep; 67(5):867-881.e7. PubMed ID: 28757209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DNA2 cooperates with the WRN and BLM RecQ helicases to mediate long-range DNA end resection in human cells.
    Sturzenegger A; Burdova K; Kanagaraj R; Levikova M; Pinto C; Cejka P; Janscak P
    J Biol Chem; 2014 Sep; 289(39):27314-27326. PubMed ID: 25122754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MRE11 and EXO1 nucleases degrade reversed forks and elicit MUS81-dependent fork rescue in BRCA2-deficient cells.
    Lemaçon D; Jackson J; Quinet A; Brickner JR; Li S; Yazinski S; You Z; Ira G; Zou L; Mosammaparast N; Vindigni A
    Nat Commun; 2017 Oct; 8(1):860. PubMed ID: 29038425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CtIP-Mediated Fork Protection Synergizes with BRCA1 to Suppress Genomic Instability upon DNA Replication Stress.
    Przetocka S; Porro A; Bolck HA; Walker C; Lezaja A; Trenner A; von Aesch C; Himmels SF; D'Andrea AD; Ceccaldi R; Altmeyer M; Sartori AA
    Mol Cell; 2018 Nov; 72(3):568-582.e6. PubMed ID: 30344097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abro1 maintains genome stability and limits replication stress by protecting replication fork stability.
    Xu S; Wu X; Wu L; Castillo A; Liu J; Atkinson E; Paul A; Su D; Schlacher K; Komatsu Y; You MJ; Wang B
    Genes Dev; 2017 Jul; 31(14):1469-1482. PubMed ID: 28860160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The WRN exonuclease domain protects nascent strands from pathological MRE11/EXO1-dependent degradation.
    Iannascoli C; Palermo V; Murfuni I; Franchitto A; Pichierri P
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Nov; 43(20):9788-803. PubMed ID: 26275776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identification and characterization of SMARCAL1 protein complexes.
    Bétous R; Glick GG; Zhao R; Cortez D
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e63149. PubMed ID: 23671665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. BOD1L Is Required to Suppress Deleterious Resection of Stressed Replication Forks.
    Higgs MR; Reynolds JJ; Winczura A; Blackford AN; Borel V; Miller ES; Zlatanou A; Nieminuszczy J; Ryan EL; Davies NJ; Stankovic T; Boulton SJ; Niedzwiedz W; Stewart GS
    Mol Cell; 2015 Aug; 59(3):462-77. PubMed ID: 26166705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ATR and ATM differently regulate WRN to prevent DSBs at stalled replication forks and promote replication fork recovery.
    Ammazzalorso F; Pirzio LM; Bignami M; Franchitto A; Pichierri P
    EMBO J; 2010 Sep; 29(18):3156-69. PubMed ID: 20802463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. FANCD2-controlled chromatin access of the Fanconi-associated nuclease FAN1 is crucial for the recovery of stalled replication forks.
    Chaudhury I; Stroik DR; Sobeck A
    Mol Cell Biol; 2014 Nov; 34(21):3939-54. PubMed ID: 25135477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Werner syndrome protein participates in a complex with RAD51, RAD54, RAD54B and ATR in response to ICL-induced replication arrest.
    Otterlei M; Bruheim P; Ahn B; Bussen W; Karmakar P; Baynton K; Bohr VA
    J Cell Sci; 2006 Dec; 119(Pt 24):5137-46. PubMed ID: 17118963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. BLM-DNA2-RPA-MRN and EXO1-BLM-RPA-MRN constitute two DNA end resection machineries for human DNA break repair.
    Nimonkar AV; Genschel J; Kinoshita E; Polaczek P; Campbell JL; Wyman C; Modrich P; Kowalczykowski SC
    Genes Dev; 2011 Feb; 25(4):350-62. PubMed ID: 21325134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. WRNIP1 protects stalled forks from degradation and promotes fork restart after replication stress.
    Leuzzi G; Marabitti V; Pichierri P; Franchitto A
    EMBO J; 2016 Jul; 35(13):1437-51. PubMed ID: 27242363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CtIP mediates replication fork recovery in a FANCD2-regulated manner.
    Yeo JE; Lee EH; Hendrickson EA; Sobeck A
    Hum Mol Genet; 2014 Jul; 23(14):3695-705. PubMed ID: 24556218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic Evidence for Roles of Yeast Mitotic Cyclins at Single-Stranded Gaps Created by DNA Replication.
    Signon L
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Feb; 8(2):737-752. PubMed ID: 29279302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanism of DNA resection during intrachromosomal recombination and immunoglobulin class switching.
    Bothmer A; Rommel PC; Gazumyan A; Polato F; Reczek CR; Muellenbeck MF; Schaetzlein S; Edelmann W; Chen PL; Brosh RM; Casellas R; Ludwig T; Baer R; Nussenzweig A; Nussenzweig MC; Robbiani DF
    J Exp Med; 2013 Jan; 210(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 23254285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stalled replication forks within heterochromatin require ATRX for protection.
    Huh MS; Ivanochko D; Hashem LE; Curtin M; Delorme M; Goodall E; Yan K; Picketts DJ
    Cell Death Dis; 2016 May; 7(5):e2220. PubMed ID: 27171262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. RAD51 bypasses the CMG helicase to promote replication fork reversal.
    Liu W; Saito Y; Jackson J; Bhowmick R; Kanemaki MT; Vindigni A; Cortez D
    Science; 2023 Apr; 380(6643):382-387. PubMed ID: 37104614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fork Cleavage-Religation Cycle and Active Transcription Mediate Replication Restart after Fork Stalling at Co-transcriptional R-Loops.
    Chappidi N; Nascakova Z; Boleslavska B; Zellweger R; Isik E; Andrs M; Menon S; Dobrovolna J; Balbo Pogliano C; Matos J; Porro A; Lopes M; Janscak P
    Mol Cell; 2020 Feb; 77(3):528-541.e8. PubMed ID: 31759821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.