524 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25734685)
1. BgN-Score and BsN-Score: bagging and boosting based ensemble neural networks scoring functions for accurate binding affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S8. PubMed ID: 25734685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative assessment of ranking accuracies of conventional and machine-learning-based scoring functions for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(5):1301-13. PubMed ID: 22411892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparative Assessment of Predictive Accuracies of Conventional and Machine Learning Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2015; 12(2):335-47. PubMed ID: 26357221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Machine-learning scoring functions for identifying native poses of ligands docked to known and novel proteins.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S3. PubMed ID: 25916860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Machine learning in computational docking.
Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. K
Jiménez J; Škalič M; Martínez-Rosell G; De Fabritiis G
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Feb; 58(2):287-296. PubMed ID: 29309725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks.
Kwon Y; Shin WH; Ko J; Lee J
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Nov; 21(22):. PubMed ID: 33182567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking.
Ballester PJ; Mitchell JB
Bioinformatics; 2010 May; 26(9):1169-75. PubMed ID: 20236947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can machine learning consistently improve the scoring power of classical scoring functions? Insights into the role of machine learning in scoring functions.
Shen C; Hu Y; Wang Z; Zhang X; Zhong H; Wang G; Yao X; Xu L; Cao D; Hou T
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jan; 22(1):497-514. PubMed ID: 31982914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Receptor pharmacophore ensemble (REPHARMBLE): a probabilistic pharmacophore modeling approach using multiple protein-ligand complexes.
Kumar SP
J Mol Model; 2018 Sep; 24(10):282. PubMed ID: 30220049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bagging and boosting negatively correlated neural networks.
Islam MM; Yao X; Shahriar Nirjon SM; Islam MA; Murase K
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2008 Jun; 38(3):771-84. PubMed ID: 18558541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Classical scoring functions for docking are unable to exploit large volumes of structural and interaction data.
Li H; Peng J; Sidorov P; Leung Y; Leung KS; Wong MH; Lu G; Ballester PJ
Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 35(20):3989-3995. PubMed ID: 30873528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the accuracy of high-throughput protein-protein affinity prediction may require better training data.
Dias R; Kolaczkowski B
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 18(Suppl 5):102. PubMed ID: 28361672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Leveraging scaffold information to predict protein-ligand binding affinity with an empirical graph neural network.
Xia C; Feng SH; Xia Y; Pan X; Shen HB
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Jan; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 36627113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Machine learning on ligand-residue interaction profiles to significantly improve binding affinity prediction.
Ji B; He X; Zhai J; Zhang Y; Man VH; Wang J
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33758923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Forging the Basis for Developing Protein-Ligand Interaction Scoring Functions.
Liu Z; Su M; Han L; Liu J; Yang Q; Li Y; Wang R
Acc Chem Res; 2017 Feb; 50(2):302-309. PubMed ID: 28182403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Knowledge-based scoring functions in drug design: 2. Can the knowledge base be enriched?
Shen Q; Xiong B; Zheng M; Luo X; Luo C; Liu X; Du Y; Li J; Zhu W; Shen J; Jiang H
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Feb; 51(2):386-97. PubMed ID: 21192670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities using multiple instance learning.
Teramoto R; Kashima H
J Mol Graph Model; 2010 Nov; 29(3):492-7. PubMed ID: 20965757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
