531 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25734685)
21. An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes.
Wang R; Lu Y; Fang X; Wang S
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):2114-25. PubMed ID: 15554682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. CScore: a simple yet effective scoring function for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction using modified CMAC learning architecture.
Ouyang X; Handoko SD; Kwoh CK
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2011 Dec; 9 Suppl 1():1-14. PubMed ID: 22144250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes.
Zhang C; Liu S; Zhu Q; Zhou Y
J Med Chem; 2005 Apr; 48(7):2325-35. PubMed ID: 15801826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bootstrap-based consensus scoring method for protein-ligand docking.
Fukunishi H; Teramoto R; Takada T; Shimada J
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 18426197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. RosENet: Improving Binding Affinity Prediction by Leveraging Molecular Mechanics Energies with an Ensemble of 3D Convolutional Neural Networks.
Hassan-Harrirou H; Zhang C; Lemmin T
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Jun; 60(6):2791-2802. PubMed ID: 32392050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predicting protein-ligand binding affinities: a low scoring game?
Marsden PM; Puvanendrampillai D; Mitchell JB; Glen RC
Org Biomol Chem; 2004 Nov; 2(22):3267-73. PubMed ID: 15534704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. SFCscore(RF): a random forest-based scoring function for improved affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes.
Zilian D; Sotriffer CA
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1923-33. PubMed ID: 23705795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. ASFP (Artificial Intelligence based Scoring Function Platform): a web server for the development of customized scoring functions.
Zhang X; Shen C; Guo X; Wang Z; Weng G; Ye Q; Wang G; He Q; Yang B; Cao D; Hou T
J Cheminform; 2021 Feb; 13(1):6. PubMed ID: 33541407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sfcnn: a novel scoring function based on 3D convolutional neural network for accurate and stable protein-ligand affinity prediction.
Wang Y; Wei Z; Xi L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Jun; 23(1):222. PubMed ID: 35676617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. SMPLIP-Score: predicting ligand binding affinity from simple and interpretable on-the-fly interaction fingerprint pattern descriptors.
Kumar S; Kim MH
J Cheminform; 2021 Mar; 13(1):28. PubMed ID: 33766140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Identification of Protein-Ligand Binding Sites by Sequence Information and Ensemble Classifier.
Ding Y; Tang J; Guo F
J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Dec; 57(12):3149-3161. PubMed ID: 29125297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A general approach for developing system-specific functions to score protein-ligand docked complexes using support vector inductive logic programming.
Amini A; Shrimpton PJ; Muggleton SH; Sternberg MJ
Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):823-31. PubMed ID: 17910057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Substituting random forest for multiple linear regression improves binding affinity prediction of scoring functions: Cyscore as a case study.
Li H; Leung KS; Wong MH; Ballester PJ
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Aug; 15(1):291. PubMed ID: 25159129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach.
Muegge I; Martin YC
J Med Chem; 1999 Mar; 42(5):791-804. PubMed ID: 10072678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Leak Proof PDBBind: A Reorganized Dataset of Protein-Ligand Complexes for More Generalizable Binding Affinity Prediction.
Li J; Guan X; Zhang O; Sun K; Wang Y; Bagni D; Head-Gordon T
ArXiv; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37645037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Radial basis function neural network ensemble for predicting protein-protein interaction sites in heterocomplexes.
Wang B; Chen P; Wang P; Zhao G; Zhang X
Protein Pept Lett; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1111-6. PubMed ID: 20509853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An ensemble-based approach to estimate confidence of predicted protein-ligand binding affinity values.
Rayka M; Mirzaei M; Mohammad Latifi A
Mol Inform; 2024 Apr; 43(4):e202300292. PubMed ID: 38358080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 2. Evaluation methods and general results.
Li Y; Han L; Liu Z; Wang R
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1717-36. PubMed ID: 24708446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Protein-Ligand Scoring with Convolutional Neural Networks.
Ragoza M; Hochuli J; Idrobo E; Sunseri J; Koes DR
J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Apr; 57(4):942-957. PubMed ID: 28368587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
