These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

528 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25734685)

  • 61. Ligand binding affinity prediction with fusion of graph neural networks and 3D structure-based complex graph.
    Dong L; Shi S; Qu X; Luo D; Wang B
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2023 Sep; 25(35):24110-24120. PubMed ID: 37655493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. A scalable and accurate method for classifying protein-ligand binding geometries using a MapReduce approach.
    Estrada T; Zhang B; Cicotti P; Armen RS; Taufer M
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jul; 42(7):758-71. PubMed ID: 22658682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Synergistic use of compound properties and docking scores in neural network modeling of CYP2D6 binding: predicting affinity and conformational sampling.
    Bazeley PS; Prithivi S; Struble CA; Povinelli RJ; Sem DS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2698-708. PubMed ID: 17125210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Extended connectivity interaction features: improving binding affinity prediction through chemical description.
    Sánchez-Cruz N; Medina-Franco JL; Mestres J; Barril X
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Jun; 37(10):1376-1382. PubMed ID: 33226061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. An Overview of Scoring Functions Used for Protein-Ligand Interactions in Molecular Docking.
    Li J; Fu A; Zhang L
    Interdiscip Sci; 2019 Jun; 11(2):320-328. PubMed ID: 30877639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Predicting protein-ligand binding residues with deep convolutional neural networks.
    Cui Y; Dong Q; Hong D; Wang X
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Feb; 20(1):93. PubMed ID: 30808287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Modeling the binding affinity of structurally diverse industrial chemicals to carbon using the artificial intelligence approaches.
    Gupta S; Basant N; Rai P; Singh KP
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Nov; 22(22):17810-27. PubMed ID: 26160122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Methods for predicting protein-ligand binding sites.
    Xie ZR; Hwang MJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1215():383-98. PubMed ID: 25330972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Inclusion of solvation and entropy in the knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Feb; 50(2):262-73. PubMed ID: 20088605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. An electronic environment and contact direction sensitive scoring function for predicting affinities of protein-ligand complexes in Contour(®).
    Lindblom PR; Wu G; Liu Z; Jim KC; Baldwin JJ; Gregg RE; Claremon DA; Singh SB
    J Mol Graph Model; 2014 Sep; 53():118-127. PubMed ID: 25123650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Four-body atomic potential for modeling protein-ligand binding affinity: application to enzyme-inhibitor binding energy prediction.
    Masso M
    BMC Struct Biol; 2013; 13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. PubMed ID: 24564918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Representability of algebraic topology for biomolecules in machine learning based scoring and virtual screening.
    Cang Z; Mu L; Wei GW
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Jan; 14(1):e1005929. PubMed ID: 29309403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Prediction of ligand binding using an approach designed to accommodate diversity in protein-ligand interactions.
    Marsh L
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(8):e23215. PubMed ID: 21860668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 1. Compilation of the test set.
    Li Y; Liu Z; Li J; Han L; Liu J; Zhao Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1700-16. PubMed ID: 24716849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Ligand biological activity predictions using fingerprint-based artificial neural networks (FANN-QSAR).
    Myint KZ; Xie XQ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1260():149-64. PubMed ID: 25502380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. ID-Score: a new empirical scoring function based on a comprehensive set of descriptors related to protein-ligand interactions.
    Li GB; Yang LL; Wang WJ; Li LL; Yang SY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Mar; 53(3):592-600. PubMed ID: 23394072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. FunFOLDQA: a quality assessment tool for protein-ligand binding site residue predictions.
    Roche DB; Buenavista MT; McGuffin LJ
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e38219. PubMed ID: 22666491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Data Mining Meets Machine Learning: A Novel ANN-based Multi-body Interaction Docking Scoring Function (MBI-score) Based on Utilizing Frequent Geometric and Chemical Patterns of Interfacial Atoms in Native Protein-ligand Complexes.
    Khashan R; Tropsha A; Zheng W
    Mol Inform; 2022 Aug; 41(8):e2100248. PubMed ID: 35142086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. SFCscore: scoring functions for affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes.
    Sotriffer CA; Sanschagrin P; Matter H; Klebe G
    Proteins; 2008 Nov; 73(2):395-419. PubMed ID: 18442132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Importance of ligand reorganization free energy in protein-ligand binding-affinity prediction.
    Yang CY; Sun H; Chen J; Nikolovska-Coleska Z; Wang S
    J Am Chem Soc; 2009 Sep; 131(38):13709-21. PubMed ID: 19736924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.