These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25735048)

  • 1. Comparison of higher-order aberration induction between manual microkeratome and femtosecond laser flap creation.
    Yvon C; Archer TJ; Gobbe M; Reinstein DZ
    J Refract Surg; 2015 Feb; 31(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 25735048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Tran DB; Sarayba MA; Bor Z; Garufis C; Duh YJ; Soltes CR; Juhasz T; Kurtz RM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 15721701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis performed with mechanical microkeratome and IntraLase femtosecond laser: 1-year follow-up.
    Buzzonetti L; Petrocelli G; Valente P; Tamburrelli C; Mosca L; Laborante A; Balestrazzi E
    Cornea; 2008 Feb; 27(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 18216572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Corneal higher order aberrations after LASIK for high myopia with a fast repetition rate excimer laser, optimized ablation profile, and femtosecond laser-assisted flap.
    Vega-Estrada A; Alió JL; Arba Mosquera S; Moreno LJ
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Oct; 28(10):689-96. PubMed ID: 23061998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Corneal aberrations and visual acuity after laser in situ keratomileusis: femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome.
    Calvo R; McLaren JW; Hodge DO; Bourne WM; Patel SV
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 May; 149(5):785-93. PubMed ID: 20227675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis: mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser flap creation.
    Muñoz G; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; García-Lázaro S; Cerviño-Expósito A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1934-44. PubMed ID: 21029903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of 2 femtosecond lasers for flap creation in myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: one-year results.
    Yu CQ; Manche EE
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Apr; 41(4):740-8. PubMed ID: 25840298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optical Zone Centration Accuracy Using Corneal Fixation-based SMILE Compared to Eye Tracker-based Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK for Myopia.
    Reinstein DZ; Gobbe M; Gobbe L; Archer TJ; Carp GI
    J Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 31(9):586-92. PubMed ID: 26352563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of corneal curvature change after mechanical laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation and femtosecond laser flap creation.
    Ortiz D; Alió JL; Piñero D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 18242446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis: comparison of femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome flap creation.
    Antonios R; Arba Mosquera S; Awwad ST
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1602-9. PubMed ID: 26432116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical effects of femtosecond and microkeratome-based flap creation: prospective contralateral examination of two patients.
    Krueger RR; Dupps WJ
    J Refract Surg; 2007 Oct; 23(8):800-7. PubMed ID: 17985800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Topographic analysis of the centration of the treatment zone after SMILE for myopia and comparison to FS-LASIK: subjective versus objective alignment.
    Lazaridis A; Droutsas K; Sekundo W
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Oct; 30(10):680-6. PubMed ID: 25291751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratomes for flap creation in laser in situ keratomileusis and effect of postoperative measurement interval on estimated femtosecond flap thickness.
    Rosa AM; Neto Murta J; Quadrado MJ; Tavares C; Lobo C; Van Velze R; Castanheira-Dinis A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):833-8. PubMed ID: 19393881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and reproducibility of artemis central flap thickness and visual outcomes of LASIK with the Carl Zeiss Meditec VisuMax femtosecond laser and MEL 80 excimer laser platforms.
    Reinstein DZ; Archer TJ; Gobbe M; Johnson N
    J Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 26(2):107-19. PubMed ID: 20163075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective contralateral eye study to compare 80- and 120-μm flap LASIK using the VisuMax femtosecond laser.
    Lim DH; Keum JE; Ju WK; Lee JH; Chung TY; Chung ES
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Jul; 29(7):462-8. PubMed ID: 23820228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study.
    Patel SV; Maguire LJ; McLaren JW; Hodge DO; Bourne WM
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Aug; 114(8):1482-90. PubMed ID: 17350688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of intraoperative subtraction pachymetry and postoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps.
    Murakami Y; Manche EE
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1879-83. PubMed ID: 21840682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for Hyperopia: Optical Zone Diameter and Spherical Aberration Induction.
    Reinstein DZ; Pradhan KR; Carp GI; Archer TJ; Gobbe M; Sekundo W; Khan R; Dhungana P
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Jun; 33(6):370-376. PubMed ID: 28586496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conservation of corneal tissue with wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Lee DH; Oh JR; Reinstein DZ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jun; 31(6):1153-8. PubMed ID: 16039489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intraocular pressure measurements during flap preparation using 2 femtosecond lasers and 1 microkeratome in human donor eyes.
    Vetter JM; Faust M; Gericke A; Pfeiffer N; Weingärtner WE; Sekundo W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Nov; 38(11):2011-8. PubMed ID: 23079315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.