These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25735048)

  • 21. Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using a 200 kHz femtosecond laser.
    Cummings AB; Cummings BK; Kelly GE
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Mar; 39(3):378-85. PubMed ID: 23352500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia.
    Lin F; Xu Y; Yang Y
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 30(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 24702576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Comparison of cornea flap made by femtosecond laser and microkeratome in laser in situ keratomileusis].
    Lian JC; Zhang SS; Zhang J; Ye S
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 49(4):305-8. PubMed ID: 23900088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Lim T; Yang S; Kim M; Tchah H
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 May; 141(5):833-9. PubMed ID: 16678504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of the Ziemer FEMTO LDV femtosecond laser and Moria M2 mechanical microkeratome.
    Zhou Y; Zhang J; Tian L; Zhai C
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 28(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 22373033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Optical Profile Following High Hyperopia Correction With a 500-Hz Excimer Laser System.
    Plaza-Puche AB; El Aswad A; Arba-Mosquera S; Wróbel-Dudzinska D; Abdou AA; Alió JL
    J Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 32(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 26812708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Wavefront-optimized ablation versus topography-guided customized ablation in myopic LASIK: comparative study of higher order aberrations.
    El Awady HE; Ghanem AA; Saleh SM
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(4):314-20. PubMed ID: 21534496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Corneal flap thickness and topography changes induced by flap creation during laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Güell JL; Velasco F; Roberts C; Sisquella MT; Mahmoud A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 15721703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative evaluation of higher-order aberrations and corneal asphericity between wavefront-guided and aspheric LASIK for myopia.
    Goyal JL; Garg A; Arora R; Jain P; Goel Y
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Nov; 30(11):777-84. PubMed ID: 25375851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cox proportional hazards model of myopic regression for laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with a femtosecond laser and with a mechanical microkeratome.
    Lin MY; Chang DC; Hsu WM; Wang IJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):992-9. PubMed ID: 22624898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. LASIK-induced aberrations: comparing corneal and whole-eye measurements.
    Gobbe M; Reinstein DZ; Archer TJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Apr; 92(4):447-55. PubMed ID: 25785529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for patients with myopia: a prospective randomized contralateral eye study.
    He L; Liu A; Manche EE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 157(6):1170-1178.e1. PubMed ID: 24560995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of corneal higher-order aberrations induced by myopic and hyperopic LASIK.
    Kohnen T; Mahmoud K; Bühren J
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Oct; 112(10):1692. PubMed ID: 16140381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: Metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhang ZH; Jin HY; Suo Y; Patel SV; Montés-Micó R; Manche EE; Xu X
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Dec; 37(12):2151-9. PubMed ID: 22108110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Corneal higher order aberrations after myopic wavefront-optimized ablation.
    Smadja D; Santhiago MR; Mello GR; Touboul D; Mrochen M; Krueger RR
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Jan; 29(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 23311740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of 2 wavefront-guided excimer lasers for myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: one-year results.
    Yu CQ; Manche EE
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Mar; 40(3):412-22. PubMed ID: 24581773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of corneal shape changes and aberrations induced By FS-LASIK and SMILE for myopia.
    Gyldenkerne A; Ivarsen A; Hjortdal JØ
    J Refract Surg; 2015 Apr; 31(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 25751842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Comparison of Lasik with femtosecond laser versus Lasik with mechanical microkeratome: predictability of flap depth, corneal biomechanical effects and optical aberrations].
    Kouassi FX; Blaizeau M; Buestel C; Schweitzer C; Gallois A; Colin J; Touboul D
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2012 Jan; 35(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 21676493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Laser in situ keratomileusis flap complications using mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser: retrospective comparison.
    Moshirfar M; Gardiner JP; Schliesser JA; Espandar L; Feiz V; Mifflin MD; Chang JC
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1925-33. PubMed ID: 21029902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of visual acuity, higher-order aberrations and corneal asphericity after refractive lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for myopia.
    Kamiya K; Shimizu K; Igarashi A; Kobashi H; Komatsu M
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 97(8):968-75. PubMed ID: 23269682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.