These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25735203)

  • 21. The role of the medial olivocochlear reflex in psychophysical masking and intensity resolution in humans: a review.
    Jennings SG
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 Jun; 125(6):2279-2308. PubMed ID: 33909513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stability of the medial olivocochlear reflex as measured by distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Mishra SK; Abdala C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Feb; 58(1):122-34. PubMed ID: 25320951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech Perception in Noise and Medial Olivocochlear Reflex: Effects of Age, Speech Stimulus, and Response-Related Variables.
    Gafoor SA; Uppunda AK
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2023 Dec; 24(6):619-631. PubMed ID: 38079021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Influence of Efferent Inhibition on Speech Perception in Noise: A Revisit Through Its Level-Dependent Function.
    Yashaswini L; Maruthy S
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 28(2S):508-515. PubMed ID: 31461336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in pre-school children.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 May; 132():109915. PubMed ID: 32028191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Medial olivocochlear function in children with poor speech-in-noise performance and language disorder.
    Rocha-Muniz CN; Mamede Carvallo RM; Schochat E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 May; 96():116-121. PubMed ID: 28390599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
    Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of 100Hz amplitude modulation on the human medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Boothalingam S; Purcell D; Scollie S
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Sep; 580():56-61. PubMed ID: 25102324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spontaneous otoacoustic emission recordings during contralateral pure-tone activation of medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Bulut E; Öztürk L
    Physiol Int; 2017 Jun; 104(2):171-182. PubMed ID: 28648121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Within- and Across-Subject Variability of Repeated Measurements of Medial Olivocochlear-Induced Changes in Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Mertes IB; Goodman SS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e72-84. PubMed ID: 26583481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Does hyperandrogenism affect the otoacoustic emissions and medial olivocochlear reflex in female adults?
    Eren E; Harman E; Arslanoğlu S; Önal K; Katlmiş H
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jul; 34(5):784-9. PubMed ID: 23770686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Easy and Hard Auditory Tasks Distinguished by Otoacoustic Emissions and Event-related Potentials: Insights into Efferent System Activity.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Milner R; Pilka E; Ganc M; Skarzynski H
    Neuroscience; 2022 May; 491():87-97. PubMed ID: 35398177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The relationship between MOC reflex and masked threshold.
    Garinis A; Werner L; Abdala C
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):128-37. PubMed ID: 21878379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contralateral inhibition of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in young noise-exposed Veterans.
    Bramhall NF; Kampel SD; Reavis KM; Konrad-Martin D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3562. PubMed ID: 36586855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Acoustic stimulation of human medial olivocochlear efferents reduces stimulus-frequency and click-evoked otoacoustic emission delays: Implications for cochlear filter bandwidths.
    Francis NA; Guinan JJ
    Hear Res; 2010 Aug; 267(1-2):36-45. PubMed ID: 20430088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Considering distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure in measurements of the medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Abdala C; Mishra SK; Williams TL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Mar; 125(3):1584-94. PubMed ID: 19275316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs.
    Guinan JJ; Backus BC; Lilaonitkul W; Aharonson V
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2003 Dec; 4(4):521-40. PubMed ID: 12799992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Strength in Ears With Low-to-Moderate Annual Noise Exposure.
    Lewis JD; Goettl-Meyer M; Lee D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Apr; 66(4):1428-1443. PubMed ID: 36940474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Right-ear advantage drives the link between olivocochlear efferent 'antimasking' and speech-in-noise listening benefits.
    Bidelman GM; Bhagat SP
    Neuroreport; 2015 May; 26(8):483-7. PubMed ID: 25919996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Electrically Evoked Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Effects on Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Guinea Pigs.
    Berezina-Greene MA; Guinan JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 18(1):153-163. PubMed ID: 27798720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.