203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25735277)
41. Digital radiography using amorphous selenium: photoconductively activated switch (PAS) readout system.
Reznik N; Komljenovic PT; Germann S; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2008 Mar; 35(3):1039-50. PubMed ID: 18404939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Segmented crystalline scintillators: an initial investigation of high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Li Y; Su Z; Wang Y; Yamamoto J; Du H; Cunningham I; Klugerman M; Shah K
Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3067-83. PubMed ID: 16279059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. An amorphous selenium based positron emission mammography camera with avalanche gain.
Reznik A; Lui BJ; Rowlands JA
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Feb; 4(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 15649089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. An investigation of signal performance enhancements achieved through innovative pixel design across several generations of indirect detection, active matrix, flat-panel arrays.
Antonuk LE; Zhao Q; El-Mohri Y; Du H; Wang Y; Street RA; Ho J; Weisfield R; Yao W
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3322-39. PubMed ID: 19673228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Measured and calculated K-fluorescence effects on the MTF of an amorphous-selenium based CCD x-ray detector.
Hunter DM; Belev G; Kasap S; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):608-22. PubMed ID: 22320770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Flat-panel digital radiology with amorphous selenium and active-matrix readout.
Rowlands JA; Zhao W; Blevis IM; Waechter DF; Huang Z
Radiographics; 1997; 17(3):753-60. PubMed ID: 9153709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Modeling Dark Current Conduction Mechanisms and Mitigation Techniques in Vertically Stacked Amorphous Selenium-Based Photodetectors.
Triet Ho LT; Mukherjee A; Vasileska D; Akis J; Stavro J; Zhao W; Goldan AH
ACS Appl Electron Mater; 2021 Aug; 3(8):3538-3546. PubMed ID: 35600494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Segmented crystalline scintillators: empirical and theoretical investigation of a high quantum efficiency EPID based on an initial engineering prototype CsI(TI) detector.
Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Perna L
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1053-66. PubMed ID: 16696482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Empirical electro-optical and x-ray performance evaluation of CMOS active pixels sensor for low dose, high resolution x-ray medical imaging.
Arvanitis CD; Bohndiek SE; Royle G; Blue A; Liang HX; Clark A; Prydderch M; Turchetta R; Speller R
Med Phys; 2007 Dec; 34(12):4612-25. PubMed ID: 18196789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Empirical investigation of the signal performance of a high-resolution, indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) for fluoroscopic and radiographic operation.
Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Siewerdsen JH; Yorkston J; Huang W; Scarpine VE; Street RA
Med Phys; 1997 Jan; 24(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 9029541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. X-ray quantum limited portal imaging using amorphous silicon flat-panel arrays.
Munro P; Bouius DC
Med Phys; 1998 May; 25(5):689-702. PubMed ID: 9608480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Detective quantum efficiency of a direct-detection active matrix flat panel imager at megavoltage energies.
Lachaine M; Fourkal E; Fallone BG
Med Phys; 2001 Jul; 28(7):1364-72. PubMed ID: 11488567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Development of Gated Pinned Avalanche Photodiode Pixels for High-Speed Low-Light Imaging.
Resetar T; De Munck K; Haspeslagh L; Rosmeulen M; Süss A; Puers R; Van Hoof C
Sensors (Basel); 2016 Aug; 16(8):. PubMed ID: 27537882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. X-ray phase imaging of biological soft tissue using a direct-sensing x-ray HARP tube camera.
Hirano K; Miyoshi T; Igarashi N; Takeda T; Wu J; Lwin TT; Kubota M; Egami N; Tanioka K; Kawai T; Wakatsuki S
Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(9):2545-52. PubMed ID: 17440251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Empirical and theoretical investigation of the noise performance of indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for diagnostic radiology.
Siewerdsen JH; Antonuk LE; el-Mohri Y; Yorkston J; Huang W; Boudry JM; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 1997 Jan; 24(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 9029542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Signal, noise power spectrum, and detective quantum efficiency of indirect-detection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology.
Siewerdsen JH; Antonuk LE; el-Mohri Y; Yorkston J; Huang W; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 1998 May; 25(5):614-28. PubMed ID: 9608470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
Hu YH; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Reinventing germanium avalanche photodetector for nanophotonic on-chip optical interconnects.
Assefa S; Xia F; Vlasov YA
Nature; 2010 Mar; 464(7285):80-4. PubMed ID: 20203606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: geometrical and effective fill factors.
Pang G; Zhao W; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1636-46. PubMed ID: 9775368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
