219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25735297)
1. Detection of microcalcifications by characteristic magnetic susceptibility effects using MR phase image cross-correlation analysis.
Baheza RA; Welch EB; Gochberg DF; Sanders M; Harvey S; Gore JC; Yankeelov TE
Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1436-52. PubMed ID: 25735297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detecting breast microcalcifications with high-field MRI.
de Leeuw H; Stehouwer BL; Bakker CJ; Klomp DW; van Diest PJ; Luijten PR; Seevinck PR; van den Bosch MA; Viergever MA; Veldhuis WB
NMR Biomed; 2014 May; 27(5):539-46. PubMed ID: 24535752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantification of Al-equivalent thickness of just visible microcalcifications in full field digital mammograms.
Carton AK; Bosmans H; Vandenbroucke D; Souverijns G; Van Ongeval C; Dragusin O; Marchal G
Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2165-76. PubMed ID: 15305471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An improved method for simulating microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Zanca F; Chakraborty DP; Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Claus F; Marchal G; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2008 Sep; 35(9):4012-8. PubMed ID: 18841852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computed radiography versus screen-film mammography in detection of simulated microcalcifications: a receiver operating characteristic study based on phantom images.
Shaw CC; Wang T; King JL; Breitenstein DS; Chang TS; Harris KM; Baratz AB; Ganott MA; Reginella R; Sumkin JH; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 1998 Mar; 5(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 9522883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging and mammography on patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Li E; Li J; Song Y; Xue M; Zhou C
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e111217. PubMed ID: 25365327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Texture detection of simulated microcalcification susceptibility effects in magnetic resonance imaging of breasts.
James D; Clymer BD; Schmalbrock P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Jun; 13(6):876-81. PubMed ID: 11382947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The detection of breast microcalcifications with medical ultrasound.
Anderson ME; Soo MS; Bentley RC; Trahey GE
J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jan; 101(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 9000730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Combination of low and high resolution T1-weighted sequences for improved evaluation of morphologic criteria in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast].
Vomweg TW; Teifke A; Schreiber WG; Schmidt M; Thelen M
Rofo; 2002 Nov; 174(11):1445-9. PubMed ID: 12424673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MRI and comparison mammography: a worthy diagnostic alliance for breast microcalcifications?
Brnic D; Brnic D; Simundic I; Vanjaka Rogosic L; Tadic T
Acta Radiol; 2016 Apr; 57(4):413-21. PubMed ID: 25995311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation of energy weighting using an energy discriminating photon counting detector for breast CT.
Kalluri KS; Mahd M; Glick SJ
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081923. PubMed ID: 23927337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value?
Westerhof JP; Fischer U; Moritz JD; Oestmann JW
Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):675-81. PubMed ID: 9609890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Photoacoustic imaging of breast microcalcifications: a validation study with 3-dimensional ex vivo data and spectrophotometric measurement.
Kang J; Kim EK; Kim GR; Yoon C; Song TK; Chang JH
J Biophotonics; 2015 Jan; 8(1-2):71-80. PubMed ID: 23996971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of breast calcification using magnetic resonance imaging.
Fatemi-Ardekani A; Boylan C; Noseworthy MD
Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5429-36. PubMed ID: 20095255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Computer-aided diagnosis in the detection of simulated clustered microcalcifications on mammography].
Horino K
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Jun; 58(7):343-8. PubMed ID: 9711073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microcalcification detectability in breast CT images using CNN observers.
Lyu SH; Abbey CK; Hernandez AM; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):933-945. PubMed ID: 38154070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
