These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25735371)

  • 1. Importance of meta-analysis and practical obstacles in oncological and epidemiological studies: statistics very close but also far!
    Tanriverdi O; Yeniceri N
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(3):1303-6. PubMed ID: 25735371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing the evidence base for cancer chemoprevention: use of meta-analysis.
    Nikolopoulos GK; Bagos PG; Bonovas S
    Curr Drug Targets; 2011 Dec; 12(13):1989-97. PubMed ID: 21158703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
    Finckh A; Tramèr MR
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):60-78. PubMed ID: 26054026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis in oral health care.
    Palmer AJ; Sendi PP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Feb; 87(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 10052365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A practical guide to research: design, execution, and publication.
    ; Audigé L; Ayeni OR; Bhandari M; Boyle BW; Briggs KK; Chan K; Chaney-Barclay K; Do HT; Ferretti M; Fu FH; Goldhahn J; Goldhahn S; Hidaka C; Hoang-Kim A; Karlsson J; Krych AJ; LaPrade RF; Levy BA; Lubowitz JH; Lyman S; Ma Y; Marx RG; Mohtadi N; Marcheggiani Muccioli GM; Nakamura N; Nguyen J; Poehling GG; Roberts LE; Rosenberg N; Shea KP; Sohani ZN; Soudry M; Voineskos S; Zaffagnini S;
    Arthroscopy; 2011 Apr; 27(4 Suppl):S1-112. PubMed ID: 21749939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical methods for dealing with publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Jin ZC; Zhou XH; He J
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):343-60. PubMed ID: 25363575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical primer: methodology and reporting of meta-analyses.
    Buccheri S; Sodeck GH; Capodanno D
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Apr; 53(4):708-713. PubMed ID: 29538746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Scientific rationality, causality and meta-analyses of clinical trials].
    De-Regil LM; Casanueva E
    Salud Publica Mex; 2008; 50(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 19039442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Considerations for planning and designing meta-analysis in oral medicine.
    Pinto A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Aug; 116(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 23663987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analysis: fact or fiction? How to interpret meta-analyses.
    Huf W; Kalcher K; Pail G; Friedrich ME; Filzmoser P; Kasper S
    World J Biol Psychiatry; 2011 Apr; 12(3):188-200. PubMed ID: 21375365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Limits of evidence-based medicine].
    de Mouzon J
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2003 Mar; 31(3):281-3. PubMed ID: 12839007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to interpret a meta-analysis and judge its value as a guide for clinical practice.
    Zlowodzki M; Poolman RW; Kerkhoffs GM; Tornetta P; Bhandari M;
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Oct; 78(5):598-609. PubMed ID: 17966018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combining heterogenous studies using the random-effects model is a mistake and leads to inconclusive meta-analyses.
    Al Khalaf MM; Thalib L; Doi SA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 64(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 20409685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
    Kranke P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Obstacles and opportunities in meta-analysis of genetic association studies.
    Salanti G; Sanderson S; Higgins JP
    Genet Med; 2005 Jan; 7(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 15654223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current controversies in the application of meta-analysis (with special reference to oncological treatments).
    Messori A
    Pharm World Sci; 1997 Jun; 19(3):152-8. PubMed ID: 9259031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
    Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.