These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25735639)
1. Impacts of early viability selection on management of inbreeding and genetic diversity in conservation. Grueber CE; Hogg CJ; Ivy JA; Belov K Mol Ecol; 2015 Apr; 24(8):1645-53. PubMed ID: 25735639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of pedigree- and DNA-based measures for identifying inbreeding depression in the critically endangered Attwater's Prairie-chicken. Hammerly SC; Morrow ME; Johnson JA Mol Ecol; 2013 Nov; 22(21):5313-28. PubMed ID: 24118220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Kinship-based management strategies for captive breeding programs when pedigrees are unknown or uncertain. Putnam AS; Ivy JA J Hered; 2014; 105(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 24143031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sex-biased inbreeding effects on reproductive success and home range size of the critically endangered black rhinoceros. Cain B; Wandera AB; Shawcross SG; Edwin Harris W; Stevens-Wood B; Kemp SJ; Okita-Ouma B; Watts PC Conserv Biol; 2014 Apr; 28(2):594-603. PubMed ID: 24641512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impacts of inbreeding, drift and selection on genetic diversity in captive breeding populations. Willoughby JR; Fernandez NB; Lamb MC; Ivy JA; Lacy RC; DeWoody JA Mol Ecol; 2015 Jan; 24(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 25443807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic drift outweighs natural selection at toll-like receptor (TLR) immunity loci in a re-introduced population of a threatened species. Grueber CE; Wallis GP; Jamieson IG Mol Ecol; 2013 Sep; 22(17):4470-82. PubMed ID: 23901904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inbreeding and loss of genetic variation in a reintroduced population of Mauritius Kestrel. Ewing SR; Nager RG; Nicoll MA; Aumjaud A; Jones CG; Keller LF Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):395-404. PubMed ID: 18294297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inbreeding and selection shape genomic diversity in captive populations: Implications for the conservation of endangered species. Willoughby JR; Ivy JA; Lacy RC; Doyle JM; DeWoody JA PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175996. PubMed ID: 28423000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. First evidence of deviation from Mendelian proportions in a conservation programme. Grueber CE; Farquharson KA; Wright BR; Wallis GP; Hogg CJ; Belov K Mol Ecol; 2021 Aug; 30(15):3703-3715. PubMed ID: 34051005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the performance of captive breeding techniques for conservation hatcheries: a case study of the delta smelt captive breeding program. Fisch KM; Ivy JA; Burton RS; May B J Hered; 2013; 104(1):92-104. PubMed ID: 23125405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pedigree analysis reveals a generational decline in reproductive success of captive Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii): implications for captive management of threatened species. Farquharson KA; Hogg CJ; Grueber CE J Hered; 2017 Jul; 108(5):488-495. PubMed ID: 28379457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inbreeding and inbreeding depression in endangered red wolves (Canis rufus). Brzeski KE; Rabon DR; Chamberlain MJ; Waits LP; Taylor SS Mol Ecol; 2014 Sep; 23(17):4241-55. PubMed ID: 25060763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Large-scale genetic survey provides insights into the captive management and reintroduction of giant pandas. Shan L; Hu Y; Zhu L; Yan L; Wang C; Li D; Jin X; Zhang C; Wei F Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Oct; 31(10):2663-71. PubMed ID: 25015646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The genealogy and genetic viability of reintroduced Yellowstone grey wolves. Vonholdt BM; Stahler DR; Smith DW; Earl DA; Pollinger JP; Wayne RK Mol Ecol; 2008 Jan; 17(1):252-74. PubMed ID: 17877715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using genomic tools to maintain diversity and fitness in conservation programmes. de Cara MÁ; Villanueva B; Toro MÁ; Fernández J Mol Ecol; 2013 Dec; 22(24):6091-9. PubMed ID: 24128280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using genome-wide measures of coancestry to maintain diversity and fitness in endangered and domestic pig populations. Bosse M; Megens HJ; Madsen O; Crooijmans RP; Ryder OA; Austerlitz F; Groenen MA; de Cara MA Genome Res; 2015 Jul; 25(7):970-81. PubMed ID: 26063737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pedigrees and microsatellites among endangered ungulates: what do they tell us? Ruiz-López MJ; Roldán ER; Espeso G; Gomendio M Mol Ecol; 2009 Apr; 18(7):1352-64. PubMed ID: 19368643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk assessment of inbreeding and outbreeding depression in a captive-breeding program. Rollinson N; Keith DM; Houde AL; Debes PV; McBride MC; Hutchings JA Conserv Biol; 2014 Apr; 28(2):529-40. PubMed ID: 24476089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Heterozygosity at a single locus explains a large proportion of variation in two fitness-related traits in great tits: a general or a local effect? García-Navas V; Cáliz-Campal C; Ferrer ES; Sanz JJ; Ortego J J Evol Biol; 2014 Dec; 27(12):2807-19. PubMed ID: 25370831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extending pedigree analysis for uncertain parentage and diverse breeding systems. Lacy RC J Hered; 2012; 103(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 22275398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]