495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25736197)
1. Biomechanical study of dynamic changes in L4-L5 foramen surface area in flexion and extension after implantation of four interspinous process devices.
Hirsch C; Breque C; Ragot S; Pascal-Mousselard H; Richer JP; Scepi M; Khiami F
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Apr; 101(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 25736197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion.
Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Kuhn S; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22094153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions.
Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Jul; 131(7):917-26. PubMed ID: 21190031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy.
Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Gaitanis IN; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):714-22. PubMed ID: 17088203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical effect of bone resorption of the spinous process after single-segment interspinous dynamic stabilization device implantation: A finite element analysis.
Zhu ZQ; Duan S; Wang KF; Liu HY; Xu S; Liu CJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul; 97(27):e11140. PubMed ID: 29979380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine.
Cakir B; Carazzo C; Schmidt R; Mattes T; Reichel H; Käfer W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1287-91. PubMed ID: 19455004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation and interspinous fixation on the stiffness of adjacent segments.
Li CD; Sun HL; Lu HZ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2013; 126(9):1732-7. PubMed ID: 23652059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].
Hrabálek L; Machác J; Vaverka M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 19912707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical effect of graded minimal-invasive decompression procedures on lumbar spinal stability.
Hartmann F; Janssen C; Böhm S; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Sep; 132(9):1233-9. PubMed ID: 22592915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pathophysiological effects of lumbar instrumentation surgery on lumbosacral nerve roots in the vertebral foramen: measurement of local pressure of intervertebral foramen.
Morishita Y; Maeda T; Ueta T; Naito M; Shiba K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Oct; 39(21):E1256-60. PubMed ID: 25029219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hybrid dynamic stabilization: a biomechanical assessment of adjacent and supraadjacent levels of the lumbar spine.
Mageswaran P; Techy F; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Sep; 17(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 22839756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intervertebral foramen variation following dynamic L4-L5 interspinal device implantation: foramen size after interspinal device implantation.
Khiami F; Brèque C; Pascal-Mousselard H; Ragot S; Hirsch C; Richer JP; Scepi M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Aug; 26(6):E215-20. PubMed ID: 23187451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interpedicular travel in the evaluation of spinal implants: an application in posterior dynamic stabilization.
Cook DJ; Yeager MS; Cheng BC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(11):923-31. PubMed ID: 22024893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication.
Richards JC; Majumdar S; Lindsey DP; Beaupré GS; Yerby SA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Apr; 30(7):744-9. PubMed ID: 15803075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis.
Akamaru T; Kawahara N; Tim Yoon S; Minamide A; Su Kim K; Tomita K; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1560-6. PubMed ID: 12865845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical testing of a PEEK-based dynamic instrumentation device in a lumbar spine model.
Herren C; Beckmann A; Meyer S; Pishnamaz M; Mundt M; Sobottke R; Prescher A; Stoffel M; Markert B; Kobbe P; Pape HC; Eysel P; Siewe J
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 May; 44():67-74. PubMed ID: 28342975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.
O'Leary P; Nicolakis M; Lorenz MA; Voronov LI; Zindrick MR; Ghanayem A; Havey RM; Carandang G; Sartori M; Gaitanis IN; Fronczak S; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical effect of interspinous dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion on range of motion of the transition segment and the adjacent segment.
Kong C; Lu S; Hai Y; Zang L
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 May; 30(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 25779689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment.
Mihara H; Onari K; Cheng BC; David SM; Zdeblick TA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 12567023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
