153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25738076)
1. Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Silorane and Methacrylate based Dental Composites using Human Gingival Fibroblasts.
Madhyastha PS; Naik DG; Kotian R; Padma D; Srikant N; Bhat KM
J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Jan; 9(1):ZC05-8. PubMed ID: 25738076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of TiF4 in Microleakage of Silorane and Methacrylate-based Composite Resins in Class V Cavities.
Koohpeima F; Sharafeddin F; Jowkar Z; Ahmadzadeh S; Mokhtari MJ; Azarian B
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Mar; 17(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 27207205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical and physical properties of silorane and methacrylate-based composites.
Porto IC; de Aguiar FH; Brandt WC; Liporoni PC
J Dent; 2013 Aug; 41(8):732-9. PubMed ID: 23735601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of microleakage in Class II cavities restored with silorane-based and methacrylate-based composite resins using different restorative techniques over time.
Khosravi K; Mousavinasab SM; Samani MS
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2015; 12(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 25878680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Polymerization profile analysis of resin composite dental restorative materials in real time.
Naoum SJ; Ellakwa A; Morgan L; White K; Martin FE; Lee IB
J Dent; 2012 Jan; 40(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 22044773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Microleakage of Silorane and Methacrylate Based Composite Materials in Class I Restorations by Using Two Different Bonding Techniques.
Alshetili MS; Aldeyab SS
J Int Oral Health; 2015; 7(Suppl 2):6-9. PubMed ID: 26668473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methacrylate- and silorane-based composite restorations: hardness, depth of cure and interfacial gap formation as a function of the energy dose.
D'Alpino PH; Bechtold J; dos Santos PJ; Alonso RC; Di Hipólito V; Silikas N; Rodrigues FP
Dent Mater; 2011 Nov; 27(11):1162-9. PubMed ID: 21925724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cytotoxic effect of silorane and methacrylate based composites on the human dental pulp stem cells and fibroblasts.
Shafiei F; Tavangar MS; Razmkhah M; Attar A; Alavi AA
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2014 Jul; 19(4):e350-8. PubMed ID: 24608214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of age condition on the distribution and integrity of inorganic fillers in dental resin composites.
D'Alpino PH; Svizero Nda R; Bim Júnior O; Valduga CJ; Graeff CF; Sauro S
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):1011-9. PubMed ID: 26388405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ageing of silorane-based and methacrylate-based composite resins: effects on translucency.
Kaizer Mda R; Diesel PG; Mallmann A; Jacques LB
J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40 Suppl 1():e64-71. PubMed ID: 22542745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cytotoxic effects to mouse and human gingival fibroblasts of a nanohybrid ormocer versus dimethacrylate-based composites.
Schubert A; Ziegler C; Bernhard A; Bürgers R; Miosge N
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jan; 23(1):133-139. PubMed ID: 29603022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of silorane and methacrylate-based composites on the polymerization heat generated with different light-curing units and dentin thicknesses.
Guiraldo RD; Consani S; Consani RL; Berger SB; Correr AB; Sinhoreti MA; Correr-Sobrinho L
Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 23969916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In Vitro Solubility and Wear Rates of Silorane and Dimethacrylate Resin Based Composite Restorative Materials under Different pH Conditions.
Soliman TA; Tubaigy KM; Raffat EM; Al-Agha EI
J Int Oral Health; 2015; 7(Suppl 1):9-13. PubMed ID: 26225097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology.
Ilie N; Hickel R
Dent Mater; 2011 Apr; 27(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 21194743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Accelerated Artificial Aging on Translucency of Methacrylate and Silorane-Based Composite Resins.
Shirinzad M; Rezaei-Soufi L; Mirtorabi MS; Vahdatinia F
J Dent (Tehran); 2016 Mar; 13(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 27928237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Polymerization kinetics and polymerization stress in resin composites after accelerated aging as a function of the expiration date.
D'Alpino PH; Svizero Nda R; Arrais CA; de Oliveira M; Alonso RC; Graeff CF
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Sep; 49():300-9. PubMed ID: 26056999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of cyclic loading on microleakage of silorane based composite compared with low shrinkage methacrylate-based composites.
Kermanshah H; Yasini E; Hoseinifar R
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2016; 13(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 27274348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flexural Strength Comparison of Silorane- and Methacrylate-Based Composites with Pre-impregnated Glass Fiber.
Doozandeh M; Alavi AA; Karimizadeh Z
J Dent (Shiraz); 2016 Jun; 17(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 27284555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Resin-composite cytotoxicity varies with shade and irradiance.
Sigusch BW; Pflaum T; Völpel A; Gretsch K; Hoy S; Watts DC; Jandt KD
Dent Mater; 2012 Mar; 28(3):312-9. PubMed ID: 22240279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
