153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25738076)
21. Evaluation of the light energy transmission and bottom/top rate in silorane and methacrylate-based composites with different photoactivation protocols.
Guiraldo RD; Consani S; Consani RL; Bataglia MP; Fugolin AP; Berger SB; Lopes MB; Moura SK; Sinhoreti MA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Sep; 12(5):361-7. PubMed ID: 22269197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluating the shear bond strength of enamel and dentin with or without etching: A comparative study between dimethacrylate-based and silorane-based adhesives.
Hajizadeh H; Nemati-Karimooy A; Nasseh A; Rahmanpour N
J Clin Exp Dent; 2015 Dec; 7(5):e563-8. PubMed ID: 26644830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparative evaluation of microleakage of restorations using silorane-based dental composite and methacrylate-based dental composites in Class II cavities: An
Sivakumar JS; Prasad AS; Soundappan S; Ragavendran N; Ajay R; Santham K
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2016 Oct; 8(Suppl 1):S81-S85. PubMed ID: 27829753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of 30% hydrogen peroxide on marginal integrity of silorane-based versus methacrylate-based composite restorations.
Hashemikamangar SS; Ghavam M; Mahinfar N; Kharazi Fard MJ
J Dent (Tehran); 2014 Sep; 11(5):545-53. PubMed ID: 25628681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Resin composite characterizations following a simplified protocol of accelerated aging as a function of the expiration date.
D'Alpino PH; Vismara MV; Mello LM; Di Hipólito V; González AH; Graeff CF
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Jul; 35():59-69. PubMed ID: 24747096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel low-shrink dental composites.
Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Nathwani H; Burke FJ; Randall RC
Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):324-35. PubMed ID: 15766579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of Shade and Light Curing Mode on the Degree of Conversion of Silorane-Based and Methacrylate-Based Resin Composites.
Sm M; M A; N S; A S
J Dent Biomater; 2016 Dec; 3(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 28959757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Two-year interfacial bond durability and nanoleakage of repaired silorane-based resin composite.
Mobarak E; El-Deeb H
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(4):408-18. PubMed ID: 23110581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of Cytotoxicity of New Nanohybrid Composite, Giomer, Glass Ionomer and Silver Reinforced Glass Ionomer using Human Gingival Fibroblast Cell Line.
Koohpeima F; Mokhtari MJ; Doozandeh M; Jowkar Z; Yazdanshenas F
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(5):368-373. PubMed ID: 28872994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fracture strength of root filled premolar teeth restored with silorane and methacrylate-based resin composite.
Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Bagheri R; Abu Holy A
J Dent; 2015 Jun; 43(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 25656772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of food simulating liquids on the flexural strength of a methacrylate and silorane-based composite.
Mohammadi E; Pishevar L; Mirzakouchaki Boroujeni P
PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0188829. PubMed ID: 29232691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with silorane-based or dimethacrylate-based composite resins.
Akbarian G; Ameri H; Chasteen JE; Ghavamnasiri M
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 24103086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage resin composite in endodontically treated premolars: 3-year follow-up.
Gönülol N; Kalyoncuoğlu E; Ertaş E; Misilli T
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May; 23(5):2323-2330. PubMed ID: 30293184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations.
Yazici AR; Ustunkol I; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24754716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of dentin pre-treatment with a casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) paste on dentin bond strength in tridimensional cavities.
Borges BC; Souza-Junior EJ; da Costa Gde F; Pinheiro IV; Sinhoreti MA; Braz R; Montes MA
Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Jan; 71(1):271-7. PubMed ID: 22414046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Repair of dimethacrylate-based composite restorations by a silorane-based composite: a one-year randomized clinical trial.
Popoff DA; Santa Rosa TT; Ferreira RC; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Mjör IA
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):E1-10. PubMed ID: 22616930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Marginal leakage and microhardness evaluation of low-shrinkage resin-based restorative materials.
Hooshmand T; Tabari N; Keshvad A
Gen Dent; 2013; 61(1):46-50; quiz 51. PubMed ID: 23302363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of Energy Drinks on Discoloration of Silorane and Dimethacrylate-Based Composite Resins.
Ahmadizenouz G; Esmaeili B; Ahangari Z; Khafri S; Rahmani A
J Dent (Tehran); 2016 Aug; 13(4):261-270. PubMed ID: 28127318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of repeated preheating of dimethacrylate and silorane-based composite resins on marginal gap of class V restorations.
Alizadeh Oskoee P; Pournaghi Azar F; Jafari Navimipour E; Ebrahimi Chaharom ME; Naser Alavi F; Salari A
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2017; 11(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 28413594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of Light-curing Parameters on Biofilm Development and Flexural Strength of a Silorane-based Composite.
Ottobelli M; Ionescu A; Cazzaniga G; Brambilla E
Oper Dent; 2016; 41(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 26266654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
