1167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25738177)
1. Immediate loading of fixed cross-arch prostheses supported by flapless-placed supershort or long implants: 1-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
Cannizzaro G; Felice P; Buti J; Leone M; Ferri V; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2015; 8(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 25738177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immediate loading of fixed cross-arch prostheses supported by flapless-placed 5 mm or 11.5 mm long implants: 5-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
Cannizzaro G; Felice P; Ippolito DR; Velasco-Ortega E; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(3):295-306. PubMed ID: 30246183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Immediate loading of 2(all-on-2) versus 4 (all-on-4) implants placed with a flapless technique supporting mandibular cross-arch fixed prostheses: 1-year results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Cannizzaro G; Felice P; Soardi E; Ferri V; Leone M; Lazzarini M; Audino S; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 23926584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Immediate loading of two (fixed-on-2) versus three (fixed-on-3) implants placed flapless supporting cross-arch fixed prostheses: One-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
Cannizzaro G; Loi I; Viola P; Ferri V; Leone M; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9 Suppl 1(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 27314120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Immediate loading of 2 (all-on-2) flapless-placed mandibular implants supporting cross-arch fixed prostheses: interim data from a 1-year follow-up prospective single cohort study.
Cannizzaro G; Felice P; Giorgi A; Lazzarini M; Ferri V; Leone M; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 22518379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Immediate loading of three (fixed-on-3) vs four (fixed-on-4) implants supporting cross-arch fixed prostheses: 1-year results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Cannizzaro G; Cavallari M; Lazzarini M; Purello D'ambrosio G; Scialpi G; Audino S; Velasco-Ortega E; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(3):323-333. PubMed ID: 30246185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
Gastaldi G; Felice P; Pistilli V; Barausse C; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 29557400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Immediate loading of two flapless placed mandibular implants supporting cross-arch fixed prostheses: a 3-year follow-up prospective single cohort study.
Cannizzaro G; Felice P; Boveri M; Lazzarini M; Ferri V; Leone M; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 24892116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 4 mm long vs longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic jaws: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Bolle C; Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli V; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 29557399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws.
Esposito M; Pistilli R; Barausse C; Felice P
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(4):383-95. PubMed ID: 25422826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 x 5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
Pistilli R; Felice P; Piattelli M; Gessaroli M; Soardi E; Barausse C; Buti J; Corvino V
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):343-57. PubMed ID: 24570980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Immediately loaded zygomatic implants vs conventional dental implants in augmented atrophic maxillae: 4 months post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Esposito M; Davó R; Marti-Pages C; Ferrer-Fuertes A; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Ippolito DR; Felice P
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):11-28. PubMed ID: 29557398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Immediate loading of two flapless placed mandibular implants supporting cross-arch fixed prostheses: A 5-year follow-up prospective single cohort study.
Cannizzaro G; Felice P; Lazzarini M; Ferri V; Leone M; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9 Suppl 1(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 27314124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two or three machined vs roughened surface dental implants loaded immediately supporting total fixed prostheses: 1-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
Cannizzaro G; Gastaldi G; Gherlone E; Vinci R; Loi I; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(3):279-291. PubMed ID: 28944356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year post-loading results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Pistilli R; Felice P; Cannizzaro G; Piatelli M; Corvino V; Barausse C; Buti J; Soardi E; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):359-72. PubMed ID: 24570981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immediate versus early loading of flapless-placed implants supporting maxillary full-arch prostheses: a randomised controlled clinical trial.
Cannizzaro G; Torchio C; Leone M; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2008; 9 Suppl 1(2):127-39. PubMed ID: 20467650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Immediate loading of two (fixed-on-2) vs four (fixed-on-4) implants placed with a flapless technique supporting mandibular cross-arch fixed prostheses: 3-year results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Cannizzaro G; Felice P; Gherlone E; Barausse C; Ferri V; Leone M; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(2):133-145. PubMed ID: 28555204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Posterior jaws rehabilitated with partial prostheses supported by 4.0 x 4.0 mm or by longer implants: One-year post-loading results from a multicenter randomised controlled trial.
Felice P; Checchi L; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Sammartino G; Masi I; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 27022635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Posterior jaws rehabilitated with partial prostheses supported by 4.0 x 4.0 mm or by longer implants: Four-month post-loading data from a randomised controlled trial.
Esposito M; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Checchi V; Diazzi M; Gatto MR; Felice P
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2015; 8(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 26355167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immediate loading of one (fixed-on-1) versus two (fixed-on-2) implants placed flapless supporting mandibular screw-retained cross-arch fixed prostheses: 10-month results from an explanatory randomised controlled trial.
Cannizzaro G; Viola P; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 31116190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]