These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25738341)

  • 21. Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials.
    Madhyastha PS; Hegde S; Srikant N; Kotian R; Iyer SS
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2017; 14(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 29109747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of enamel surface following five composite removal methods after bracket debonding.
    Hong YH; Lew KK
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Apr; 17(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 7781720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of finishing instrumentation on the marginal integrity of resin-based composite restorations.
    Maresca C; Pimenta LA; Heymann HO; Ziemiecki TL; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Apr; 22(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 20433561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Titanium implant surface roughness after different implantoplasty protocols: A laboratory study.
    Yildiz H; Bertl K; Stavropoulos A
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Dec; 8(6):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 36069295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ultrasonic sulcus penetration: a new approach for full crown preparations.
    Sous M; Lepetitcorps Y; Lasserre JF; Six N
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Jun; 29(3):277-87. PubMed ID: 19537467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of Smear Layers Created by Different Burs on Durability of Self-Etching Adhesive Bond to Dentin of Primary Teeth.
    Rirattanapong P; Senawongse P; Harnirattisal C; Wunsiw W
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(3):224-30. PubMed ID: 26208066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Topography of Monolithic Zirconia.
    Goo CL; Yap A; Tan K; Fawzy AS
    Oper Dent; 2016; 41(4):417-23. PubMed ID: 26666390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative evaluation of the enamel margins roughness obtained with different finishing devices.
    Scotti N; Bregola A; Chiandussi G; Paolino D; Pasqualini D; Berutti E
    Minerva Stomatol; 2012; 61(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 22274305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures.
    Başeren M
    J Biomater Appl; 2004 Oct; 19(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 15381785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing.
    Jung M; Eichelberger K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 17695607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Atomic force microscopy analysis of enamel nanotopography after interproximal reduction.
    Meredith L; Farella M; Lowrey S; Cannon RD; Mei L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Apr; 151(4):750-757. PubMed ID: 28364899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Root surface removal and resultant surface texture with diamond-coated ultrasonic inserts: an in vitro and SEM study.
    Vastardis S; Yukna RA; Rice DA; Mercante D
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 15842261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of dental finishing instruments on the surface roughness of composite resins as elucidated by atomic force microscopy.
    Botta AC; Duarte S; Paulin Filho PI; Gheno SM
    Microsc Microanal; 2008 Oct; 14(5):380-6. PubMed ID: 18793482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of different grit sizes of diamond rotary instruments for tooth preparation on the retention and adaptation of complete coverage restorations.
    Li YQ; Wang H; Wang YJ; Chen JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 22304742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of polishing techniques on the surface roughness of acrylic denture base resins.
    Kuhar M; Funduk N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 15624002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Three-dimensional surface profile analysis of different types of flowable restorative resins following different finishing protocols.
    Yazici AR; Müftü A; Kugel G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jul; 8(5):9-17. PubMed ID: 17618325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The effect of cavity finishing on the initial sealing capacity of amalgam fillings in vitro].
    Haller B; Klaiber B; Tens KD
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1991; 101(8):986-92. PubMed ID: 1882221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.