79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25739791)
1. Outcome quality assessment by surgical process compliance measures in laparoscopic surgery.
Schumann S; Bühligen U; Neumuth T
Artif Intell Med; 2015 Feb; 63(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 25739791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Distance measures for surgical process models.
Schumann S; Bühligen U; Neumuth T
Methods Inf Med; 2013; 52(5):422-31. PubMed ID: 23907307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Voluntary autonomous simulator based training in minimally invasive surgery, residents' compliance and reflection.
van Empel PJ; Verdam MG; Strypet M; van Rijssen LB; Huirne JA; Scheele F; Bonjer HJ; Meijerink WJ
J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(4):564-70. PubMed ID: 22677599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multi-perspective workflow modeling for online surgical situation models.
Franke S; Meixensberger J; Neumuth T
J Biomed Inform; 2015 Apr; 54():158-66. PubMed ID: 25752728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Boot cAMP: educational outcomes after 4 successive years of preparatory simulation-based training at onset of internship.
Fernandez GL; Page DW; Coe NP; Lee PC; Patterson LA; Skylizard L; St Louis M; Amaral MH; Wait RB; Seymour NE
J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 22365874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Features of primary care associated with variations in process and outcome of care of people with diabetes.
Khunti K; Ganguli S; Baker R; Lowy A
Br J Gen Pract; 2001 May; 51(466):356-60. PubMed ID: 11360698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EndoCAS navigator platform: a common platform for computer and robotic assistance in minimally invasive surgery.
Megali G; Ferrari V; Freschi C; Morabito B; Cavallo F; Turini G; Troia E; Cappelli C; Pietrabissa A; Tonet O; Cuschieri A; Dario P; Mosca F
Int J Med Robot; 2008 Sep; 4(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 18698670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].
Giraldes Mdo R
Acta Med Port; 2008; 21(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 19187682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Similarity metrics for surgical process models.
Neumuth T; Loebe F; Jannin P
Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jan; 54(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 22056273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implementation of surgical quality improvement: auditing tool for surgical site infection prevention practices.
Hechenbleikner EM; Hobson DB; Bennett JL; Wick EC
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jan; 58(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 25489698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Objective laparoscopic skills assessments of surgical residents using Hidden Markov Models based on haptic information and tool/tissue interactions.
Rosen J; Solazzo M; Hannaford B; Sinanan M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 81():417-23. PubMed ID: 11317782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pediatric robotic-assisted surgery: too early an assessment?
Peters CA
Pediatrics; 2009 Dec; 124(6):1680-1. PubMed ID: 19948633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for patients with lower rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy.
Liang JT; Lai HS; Lee PH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1285-7. PubMed ID: 17235719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Real-time augmented feedback benefits robotic laparoscopic training.
Judkins TN; Oleynikov D; Stergiou N
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 119():243-8. PubMed ID: 16404053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for hysterectomy and pelvic organ prolapse repair.
Paraiso MF
Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 25274486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures.
Geis WP; Kim HC; Brennan EJ; McAfee PC; Wang Y
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():471-81. PubMed ID: 10172847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality, not volume, determines outcome of coronary artery bypass surgery in a university-based community hospital network.
Kurlansky PA; Argenziano M; Dunton R; Lancey R; Nast E; Stewart A; Williams T; Zapolanski A; Chang H; Tingley J; Smith CR
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Feb; 143(2):287-93. PubMed ID: 22104669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Training for advanced laparoscopic surgery.
Gutt CN; Kim ZG; Krähenbühl L
Eur J Surg; 2002; 168(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 12182243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Simulation training in surgical education - application of virtual reality laparoscopic simulators in a surgical skills course].
Lehmann KS; Gröne J; Lauscher JC; Ritz JP; Holmer C; Pohlen U; Buhr HJ
Zentralbl Chir; 2012 Apr; 137(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 22495487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.
Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R
BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
