These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. The effects of owl predation on the foraging behavior of heteromyid rodents. Brown JS; Kotler BP; Smith RJ; Wirtz WO Oecologia; 1988 Aug; 76(3):408-415. PubMed ID: 28312021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Predation Risk Perception, Food Density and Conspecific Cues Shape Foraging Decisions in a Tropical Lizard. Drakeley M; Lapiedra O; Kolbe JJ PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138016. PubMed ID: 26384236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Foraging decisions in wild versus domestic Mus musculus: What does life in the lab select for? Troxell-Smith SM; Tutka MJ; Albergo JM; Balu D; Brown JS; Leonard JP Behav Processes; 2016 Jan; 122():43-50. PubMed ID: 26548716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Testing values of crested porcupine habitats by experimental food patches. Brown JS; Alkon PU Oecologia; 1990 Jul; 83(4):512-518. PubMed ID: 28313185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Size dependency of patch departure behavior: evidence from granivorous rodents. Cozzoli F; Gjoni V; Basset A Ecology; 2019 Oct; 100(10):e02800. PubMed ID: 31233618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The role of food odor in invertebrate foraging. Zjacic N; Scholz M Genes Brain Behav; 2022 Feb; 21(2):e12793. PubMed ID: 34978135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sexual segregation of forage patch use: Support for the social-factors and predation hypotheses. Biggerstaff MT; Lashley MA; Chitwood MC; Moorman CE; DePerno CS Behav Processes; 2017 Mar; 136():36-42. PubMed ID: 28069490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Moving on with foraging theory: incorporating movement decisions into the functional response of a gregarious shorebird. van Gils JA; van der Geest M; De Meulenaer B; Gillis H; Piersma T; Folmer EO J Anim Ecol; 2015 Mar; 84(2):554-64. PubMed ID: 25283546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Testing mechanisms of coexistence among two species of frugivorous primates. Houle A; Vickery WL; Chapman CA J Anim Ecol; 2006 Jul; 75(4):1034-44. PubMed ID: 17009766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Social foragers adopt a riskier foraging mode in the centre of their groups. Beauchamp G Biol Lett; 2013; 9(6):20130528. PubMed ID: 24108674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Risk of predation makes foragers less choosy about their food. Charalabidis A; Dechaume-Moncharmont FX; Petit S; Bohan DA PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187167. PubMed ID: 29121652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Group size, survival and surprisingly short lifespan in socially foraging bats. Gager Y; Gimenez O; O'Mara MT; Dechmann DK BMC Ecol; 2016 Jan; 16():2. PubMed ID: 26767616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]