274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25741195)
1. Qualitative and quantitative analysis with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: diagnosis value in hypoechoic renal angiomyolipoma.
Lu Q; Huang BJ; Wang WP; Li CX; Xue LY
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(2):334-41. PubMed ID: 25741195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Triphasic and epithelioid minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma: qualitative and quantitative CEUS characteristics and distinguishing features.
Lu Q; Li CX; Huang BJ; Xue LY; Wang WP
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Feb; 40(2):333-42. PubMed ID: 25139641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histotype differentiation of hypo-echoic renal tumors on CEUS: usefulness of enhancement homogeneity and intensity.
Lu Q; Xue LY; Huang BJ; Wang WP; Li CX
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Aug; 40(6):1675-83. PubMed ID: 25549784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma: the initial study with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
Lu Q; Wang W; Huang B; Li C; Li C
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1896-901. PubMed ID: 22906749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Biexponential and Monoexponential Model of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Distinguishing between Common Renal Cell Carcinoma and Fat Poor Angiomyolipoma.
Ding Y; Zeng M; Rao S; Chen C; Fu C; Zhou J
Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(6):853-863. PubMed ID: 27833401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differentiating small renal carcinoma and angiomyolipoma.
Chen L; Wang L; Diao X; Qian W; Fang L; Pang Y; Zhan J; Chen Y
Biosci Trends; 2015 Aug; 9(4):252-8. PubMed ID: 26268710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiation of Renal Tumor Histotypes: Usefulness of Quantitative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.
Lu Q; Huang BJ; Xue LY; Fan PL; Wang WP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):W335-42. PubMed ID: 26295670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT.
Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The independent indicators for differentiating renal cell carcinoma from renal angiomyolipoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Cao H; Fang L; Chen L; Zhan J; Diao X; Liu Y; Lu C; Zhang Z; Chen Y
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Mar; 20(1):32. PubMed ID: 32228606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-frame-rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound to differentiate between clear cell renal cell carcinoma and angiomyolipoma.
Wang J; Shi J; Gao L; Hu W; Chen M; Zhang W
BMC Cancer; 2024 May; 24(1):659. PubMed ID: 38816725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of CEUS for renal cell carcinoma and angiomyolipoma: a narrative review.
Dipinto P; Canale V; Minelli R; Capuano MA; Catalano O; Di Pierro GB; Anceschi U; PerdonĂ S; Tufano A
J Ultrasound; 2024 Mar; 27(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 38238503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for small renal masses.
Oh TH; Lee YH; Seo IY
Korean J Urol; 2014 Sep; 55(9):587-92. PubMed ID: 25237460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Renal cell carcinoma and renal angiomyolipoma: differential diagnosis with real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
Xu ZF; Xu HX; Xie XY; Liu GJ; Zheng YL; Lu MD
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 May; 29(5):709-17. PubMed ID: 20427782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiation of renal cell carcinoma subtypes and angiomyolipoma.
Li CX; Lu Q; Huang BJ; Xue LY; Yan LX; Zheng FY; Wen JX; Wang WP
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):795-802. PubMed ID: 26971426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sonographic Features of Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted MR Images: Differentiating Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK; Cho KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):605-613. PubMed ID: 30040467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Papillary renal cell carcinoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Differentiation of distinct histological types with contrast - enhanced ultrasonography.
Xue LY; Lu Q; Huang BJ; Li Z; Li CX; Wen JX; Wang WP
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1849-56. PubMed ID: 26149528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative computer-aided diagnostic algorithm for automated detection of peak lesion attenuation in differentiating clear cell from papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, oncocytoma, and fat-poor angiomyolipoma on multiphasic multidetector computed tomography.
Coy H; Young JR; Douek ML; Brown MS; Sayre J; Raman SS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jul; 42(7):1919-1928. PubMed ID: 28280876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pixel distribution analysis: can it be used to distinguish clear cell carcinomas from angiomyolipomas with minimal fat?
Catalano OA; Samir AE; Sahani DV; Hahn PF
Radiology; 2008 Jun; 247(3):738-46. PubMed ID: 18413886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiphasic enhancement patterns of small renal masses (≤4 cm) on preoperative computed tomography: utility for distinguishing subtypes of renal cell carcinoma, angiomyolipoma, and oncocytoma.
Pierorazio PM; Hyams ES; Tsai S; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Mullins JK; Johnson PT; Fishman EK; Allaf ME
Urology; 2013 Jun; 81(6):1265-71. PubMed ID: 23601445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Diagnosing Small Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes and Angiomyolipoma.
Cao H; Fang L; Chen L; Zhan J; Diao X; Liu Y; Lu C; Zhang Z; Chen Y
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Jun; 41(6):1415-1423. PubMed ID: 34499770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
