118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25741527)
41. Electronic Health Record Use in Public Health Infectious Disease Surveillance, USA, 2018-2019.
Willis SJ; Cocoros NM; Randall LM; Ochoa AM; Haney G; Hsu KK; DeMaria A; Klompas M
Curr Infect Dis Rep; 2019 Aug; 21(10):32. PubMed ID: 31451945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Monitoring Depression Rates in an Urban Community: Use of Electronic Health Records.
Davidson AJ; Xu S; Oronce CIA; Durfee MJ; McCormick EV; Steiner JF; Havranek E; Beck A
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2018; 24(6):E6-E14. PubMed ID: 29334514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Evidence that electronic health records can promote physician counseling for healthy behaviors.
Bae J; Hockenberry JM; Rask KJ; Becker ER
Health Care Manage Rev; 2017; 42(3):258-268. PubMed ID: 27050926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Association between electronic health records and health care utilization.
Kaushal R; Edwards A; Kern LM;
Appl Clin Inform; 2015; 6(1):42-55. PubMed ID: 25848412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A Quantitative Bias Analysis Approach to Informative Presence Bias in Electronic Health Records.
Zhang H; Clark AS; Hubbard RA
Epidemiology; 2024 May; 35(3):349-358. PubMed ID: 38630509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Development of an Algorithm to Classify Colonoscopy Indication from Coded Health Care Data.
Adams KF; Johnson EA; Chubak J; Kamineni A; Doubeni CA; Buist DS; Williams AE; Weinmann S; Doria-Rose VP; Rutter CM
EGEMS (Wash DC); 2015; 3(1):1171. PubMed ID: 26290883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Exploring electronic health records as a population health surveillance tool of cardiovascular disease risk factors.
Sidebottom AC; Johnson PJ; VanWormer JJ; Sillah A; Winden TJ; Boucher JL
Popul Health Manag; 2015 Apr; 18(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 25290223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A General Framework for Considering Selection Bias in EHR-Based Studies: What Data Are Observed and Why?
Haneuse S; Daniels M
EGEMS (Wash DC); 2016; 4(1):1203. PubMed ID: 27668265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland.
Kaipio J; Lääveri T; Hyppönen H; Vainiomäki S; Reponen J; Kushniruk A; Borycki E; Vänskä J
Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():266-281. PubMed ID: 27919385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Retooling of Paper-based Outcome Measures to Electronic Format: Comparison of the NY State Public Risk Model and EHR-derived Risk Models for CABG Mortality.
Hannan EL; Barrett SC; Samadashvili Z; Schmaltz SP
Med Care; 2019 May; 57(5):377-384. PubMed ID: 30870389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Quantifying the competitiveness of the electronic health record market and its implications for interoperability.
Sorace J; Wong HH; DeLeire T; Xu D; Handler S; Garcia B; MaCurdy T
Int J Med Inform; 2020 Apr; 136():104037. PubMed ID: 32000012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Assessing the Precision of ICD-10 Codes for Uveitis in 2 Electronic Health Record Systems.
Palestine AG; Merrill PT; Saleem SM; Jabs DA; Thorne JE
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 136(10):1186-1190. PubMed ID: 30054618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Unlocking the Potential of Electronic Health Records for Health Research.
Lee S; Xu Y; D Apos Souza AG; Martin EA; Doktorchik C; Zhang Z; Quan H
Int J Popul Data Sci; 2020 Jan; 5(1):1123. PubMed ID: 32935049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effectiveness of Medicare cost-sharing elimination for Cancer screening on utilization.
Xu WY; Wickizer TM; Jung JK
BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Jun; 19(1):392. PubMed ID: 31208422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparing Population-based Risk-stratification Model Performance Using Demographic, Diagnosis and Medication Data Extracted From Outpatient Electronic Health Records Versus Administrative Claims.
Kharrazi H; Chi W; Chang HY; Richards TM; Gallagher JM; Knudson SM; Weiner JP
Med Care; 2017 Aug; 55(8):789-796. PubMed ID: 28598890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Monitoring Prevalence, Treatment, and Control of Metabolic Conditions in New York City Adults Using 2013 Primary Care Electronic Health Records: A Surveillance Validation Study.
Thorpe LE; McVeigh KH; Perlman S; Chan PY; Bartley K; Schreibstein L; Rodriguez-Lopez J; Newton-Dame R
EGEMS (Wash DC); 2016; 4(1):1266. PubMed ID: 28154836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Applied Use of Composite Quality Measures for EHR-enabled Practices.
Amoah AO; Amirfar S; Silfen SL; Singer J; Wang JJ
EGEMS (Wash DC); 2015; 3(1):1118. PubMed ID: 26290881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Access to care and utilization among children: estimating the effects of public and private coverage.
Selden TM; Hudson JL
Med Care; 2006 May; 44(5 Suppl):I19-26. PubMed ID: 16625060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
