These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25741804)
1. Minimal inhibitory concentration drift of glycopeptides and linezolid against S. Aureus at a Chinese children's center, 2009-2013. Jing CM; Xie W; Chen Y; Wang C Pediatr Infect Dis J; 2015 Jan; 34(1):108-11. PubMed ID: 25741804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Influence of inoculum size on MICs for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus]. Miyake N; Kadowaki M; Sato Y; Eriguchi Y; Nagasaki Y; Harada Y; Uchida Y; Shimono N Jpn J Antibiot; 2011 Aug; 64(4):231-7. PubMed ID: 22066347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, pristinamycin and other antibiotics. Samra Z; Ofer O; Shmuely H Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Mar; 7(3):148-50. PubMed ID: 15792257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative in-vitro evaluation of resistance selection after exposure to teicoplanin, vancomycin, linezolid and quinupristin-dalfopristin in Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp. Drago L; Nicola L; De Vecchi E Clin Microbiol Infect; 2008 Jun; 14(6):608-11. PubMed ID: 18397336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The incidence and risk factors for heterogeneous vancomycin intermediate Staphylococcus aureus]. Feng NN; Wang Q; Song YL; He LX; Zhou CM; Xie HM; Li HY Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 52(4):318-22. PubMed ID: 23925360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro activity of ceftobiprole, linezolid, tigecycline, and 23 other antimicrobial agents against Staphylococcus aureus isolates in China. Wang H; Liu Y; Sun H; Xu Y; Xie X; Chen M Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2008 Oct; 62(2):226-9. PubMed ID: 18653301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vancomycin MIC creep in non-vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA), vancomycin-susceptible clinical methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) blood isolates from 2001-05. Steinkraus G; White R; Friedrich L J Antimicrob Chemother; 2007 Oct; 60(4):788-94. PubMed ID: 17623693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolide and tigecycline susceptibilities of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus strains by E-test]. Pelitli TS; Cesur S; Kınıklı S; Irmak H; Demiröz AP; Karakoç E Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Oct; 45(4):758-61. PubMed ID: 22090309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro activity of linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, moxifloxacin and mupirocin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: comparative evaluation by the E test and a broth microdilution method. Abb J Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2002 Aug; 43(4):319-21. PubMed ID: 12151194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Sensitivity of methicillin resistant staphylococci to linezolid and some other antimicrobial agents]. Ertek M; Yazgi H; Aktaş E; Ayyildiz A; Parlak M Mikrobiyol Bul; 2003 Oct; 37(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 14748259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative bactericidal activities of daptomycin, glycopeptides, linezolid and tigecycline against blood isolates of Gram-positive bacteria in Taiwan. Huang YT; Liao CH; Teng LJ; Hsueh PR Clin Microbiol Infect; 2008 Feb; 14(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 18076671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pharmacodynamic comparison of linezolid, teicoplanin and vancomycin against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci collected from hospitals in Brazil. Kuti JL; Kiffer CR; Mendes CM; Nicolau DP Clin Microbiol Infect; 2008 Feb; 14(2):116-23. PubMed ID: 18076672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High percentage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides in The Netherlands. Van Griethuysen A; Van 't Veen A; Buiting A; Walsh T; Kluytmans J J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Jun; 41(6):2487-91. PubMed ID: 12791870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of teicoplanin and vancomycin in vitro activity on clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Tascini C; Flammini S; Leonildi A; Ciullo I; Tagliaferri E; Menichetti F J Chemother; 2012 Aug; 24(4):187-90. PubMed ID: 23040680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro susceptibility to methicillin, vancomycin and linezolid of staphylococci isolated from bloodstream infections in eastern Turkey. Tekin A; Dal T; Deveci Ö; Tekin R; Özcan N; Atmaca S; Dayan S Braz J Microbiol; 2014; 45(3):829-33. PubMed ID: 25477914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A 5-year survey of antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from patients with bloodstream infections in Northeast Italy. Cojutti P; Scarparo C; Sartor A; Coato P; Rigoli R; Pea F Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2015 Jan; 81(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 25301716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative in vitro activity of linezolid and five other antimicrobials against nosocomial isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Metallidis S; Chatzidimitriou M; Nikolaidis P; Tsona A; Bisiklis A; Kollaras P; Tsiakiri E; Koumentaki E; Alexiou-Daniel S J Chemother; 2003 Oct; 15(5):442-8. PubMed ID: 14603881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]