457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25741823)
1. Perception of adults' smile esthetics among orthodontists, clinicians and laypeople.
Cotrim ER; Vasconcelos Júnior ÁV; Haddad AC; Reis SA
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 25741823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of symmetric and asymmetric alterations of maxillary canine gingival margin on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists, dentists, and laypersons.
Katiyar S; Gandhi S; Sodawala J; Anita G; Hamdani S; Jain S
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):586-591. PubMed ID: 28169254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople to altered maxillary incisor crowding.
Ma W; Preston B; Asai Y; Guan H; Guan G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):579-86. PubMed ID: 25439208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of maxillary canine gingival margin asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons.
Correa BD; Vieira Bittencourt MA; Machado AW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 24373655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Orthodontists' and laypeople's perception of smile height aesthetics in relation to varying degrees of transverse cant of anterior teeth.
Shiyan H; Xu Q; Shuhao X; Nanquan R; Xiaobing L
Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 27468592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of vertical positions of anterior teeth on smile esthetics in Japanese and korean orthodontists and orthodontic patients.
Ioi H; Kang S; Shimomura T; Kim SS; Park SB; Son WS; Takahashi I
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Aug; 25(4):274-82. PubMed ID: 23910186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two scales for evaluation of smile and dental attractiveness.
Oliveira PL; Motta AF; Guerra CJ; Mucha JN
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):42-8. PubMed ID: 25992986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople.
Pinzan-Vercelino CRM; Costa ACS; Ferreira MC; Bramante FS; Fialho MPN; Gurgel JA
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):314-321. PubMed ID: 31153615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics.
Roden-Johnson D; Gallerano R; English J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 15775949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in smile parameters as perceived by orthodontists, dentists, artists, and laypeople.
Gul-e-Erum ; Fida M
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 18575307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of the gingival display on posed smile with different facial forms: a comparison of dentists and patients concepts.
Akhare PJ; Daga A
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 23422598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople to altered dental esthetics in cases with congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors.
Rosa M; Olimpo A; Fastuca R; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2013 Oct; 14():34. PubMed ID: 24325825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of canine characteristics and symmetry on perceived smile attractiveness when canine teeth are substituted for lateral incisors.
Rayner WJ; Barber SK; Spencer RJ
J Orthod; 2015 Mar; 42(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 25808380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles.
Işiksal E; Hazar S; Akyalçin S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jan; 129(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 16443472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of buccal corridors on smile attractiveness.
Martin AJ; Buschang PH; Boley JC; Taylor RW; McKinney TW
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):530-7. PubMed ID: 17974544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Esthetic perception of smile components by orthodontists, general dentists, dental students, artists, and laypersons.
Sadrhaghighi H; Zarghami A; Sadrhaghighi S; Eskandarinezhad M
J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 Nov; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 27590143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the presence of unilateral maxillary incisor edge asymmetries influence the perception of smile esthetics?
Betrine Ribeiro J; Alecrim Figueiredo B; Wilson Machado A
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Jul; 29(4):291-297. PubMed ID: 28556552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perception of oral and maxillofacial surgeons, orthodontists and laypersons in relation to the harmony of the smile.
Lauria A; Rodrigues DC; de Medeiros RC; Moreira RW
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1664-8. PubMed ID: 24969767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do various degrees of tooth decalcification affect orthodontists', general dentists' and laypersons' ratings of smile esthetics?
Al-Omari I; Al-Bitar Z; Hamdan AM
Angle Orthod; 2020 May; 90(3):405-410. PubMed ID: 33378442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of mesiodistal angulation of the maxillary central incisors on esthetic perceptions of the smile in the frontal view.
Yang S; Guo Y; Yang X; Zhang F; Wang J; Qiu J; Li J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):396-404. PubMed ID: 26321337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
