712 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25742569)
1. Surgical treatment of microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of pathologic features with implications on radicality.
Yoneda JY; Braganca JF; Sarian LO; Borba PP; Conceição JC; Zeferino LC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):694-8. PubMed ID: 25742569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of treatment modalities and prognosis on microinvasive cervical cancer: a 10-year cohort study in China.
Qian Q; Yang J; Cao D; You Y; Chen J; Shen K
J Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Oct; 25(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 25142622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical value of cold knife conization as conservative management in patients with microinvasive cervical squamous cell cancer (stage IA1).
He Y; Wu YM; Zhao Q; Wang T; Wang Y; Kong WM; Song F; Duan W; Zhu L; Zhang WY
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1306-11. PubMed ID: 24987910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The clinical outcome of patients with stage Ia1 and Ia2 squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Cooperation Task Force (CTF) study.
Gadducci A; Sartori E; Maggino T; Landoni F; Zola P; Cosio S; Pasinetti B; Alessi C; Maneo A; Ferrero A
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2003; 24(6):513-6. PubMed ID: 14658592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conservative therapy in microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix is justified: an analysis of 59 cases and a review of the literature.
Baalbergen A; Smedts F; Helmerhorst TJ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Dec; 21(9):1640-5. PubMed ID: 21897274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival of women with microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix is not improved by radical surgery.
Bean LM; Ward KK; Plaxe SC; McHale MT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 217(3):332.e1-332.e6. PubMed ID: 28522318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of outcomes of microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix by treatment type.
Reynolds EA; Tierney K; Keeney GL; Felix JC; Weaver AL; Roman LD; Cliby WA
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Nov; 116(5):1150-7. PubMed ID: 20966701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Less radical surgery than radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a pilot study.
Pluta M; Rob L; Charvat M; Chmel R; Halaska M; Skapa P; Robova H
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 19264352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multivariate analysis of histopathologic prognostic factors for invasive cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy and systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy.
Takeda N; Sakuragi N; Takeda M; Okamoto K; Kuwabara M; Negishi H; Oikawa M; Yamamoto R; Yamada H; Fujimoto S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2002 Dec; 81(12):1144-51. PubMed ID: 12519111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do FIGO stage IA and small (≤2 cm) IB1 cervical adenocarcinomas have a good prognosis and warrant less radical surgery?
Al-Kalbani M; McVeigh G; Nagar H; McCluggage WG
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 22080884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of Conservative Surgical Treatment and Prognosis of Microinvasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix Stage IA1: Results of Follow-Up to 20 Years.
Hartman CA; Teixeira JC; Barbosa SB; Figueiredo SM; Andrade LA; Bastos JF
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Feb; 27(2):357-363. PubMed ID: 27984378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety of less aggressive surgery for stage IA1 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.
Lee JY; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 May; 40(5):1382-8. PubMed ID: 24689464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microinvasive squamous carcinoma of the cervix: treatment modalities.
Mota F
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Jun; 82(6):505-9. PubMed ID: 12780420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Locoregional spread and survival of stage IIA1 versus stage IIA2 cervical cancer.
Hongladaromp W; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenkwan K; Srisomboon J
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(2):887-90. PubMed ID: 24568513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conization and lymph node evaluation in low-risk cervical cancer. Is it time to avoid radical surgery? Retrospective series and literature review.
Lucchini SM; Ferreyra HD; Landeros J; Esteban A; Donetch G; Goldsman MG; Borla HF; Heredia F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Nov; 266():163-168. PubMed ID: 34673464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeat surgery in patients with cervical cancer stage FIGO IA1: a series of 156 cases and a review of the literature.
Hefler LA; Polterauer S; Schneitter A; Concin N; Hofstetter G; Bentz E; Leipold H; Tempfer C; Reinthaller A
Anticancer Res; 2010 Feb; 30(2):565-8. PubMed ID: 20332471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection and significance of parametrial micrometastases in early-stage cervical cancer.
Brady PC; Chen X; Burke WM; Deutsch I; Sun X; Herzog TJ; Wright JD
Anticancer Res; 2011 Jan; 31(1):243-7. PubMed ID: 21273605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure findings for identification of patients with early-stage cervical cancer suitable for less radical surgery.
Kim MK; Kim MA; Kim JW; Chung HH; Park NH; Song YS; Kang SB
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Sep; 22(7):1214-9. PubMed ID: 22801033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conization using electrosurgical conization and cold coagulation for international federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IA1 squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix.
Lee SJ; Kim WY; Lee JW; Kim HS; Choi YL; Ahn GH; Lee JH; Kim BG; Bae DS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Apr; 19(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 19407568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can pelvic lymphadenectomy be omitted in stage IA2 to IIB uterine cervical cancer?
Togami S; Kamio M; Yanazume S; Yoshinaga M; Douchi T
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Jul; 24(6):1072-6. PubMed ID: 24905616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
