These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25742681)

  • 1. ScanX Swift™: comfortable, convenient, affordable PSP digital imaging.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2014; 35(10):780. PubMed ID: 25742681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time and motion study: a comparison of two photostimulable phosphor imaging systems used in dentistry.
    Ramamurthy R; Canning CF; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Sep; 35(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 16940478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New nanophosphor scintillators for solid-state digital dental imagers.
    Mupparapu M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Nov; 35(6):475-6. PubMed ID: 17082344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital radiography for the dental assistant.
    Ng VM; Sidhu G; Wood AJ
    Dent Assist; 2007; 76(5):22-3, 26-7. PubMed ID: 17970340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
    Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
    Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A paradigm shift in cephalometric imaging.
    Keim RG
    J Clin Orthod; 2003 Apr; 37(4):181-2. PubMed ID: 12747071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Oblique laterals.
    Dalley K
    Br Dent J; 2009 Jun; 206(12):607. PubMed ID: 19557039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Storage phosphor plates: how durable are they as a digital dental radiographic system?
    Bedard A; Davis TD; Angelopoulos C
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 May; 5(2):57-69. PubMed ID: 15150634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of ambient lighting intensity and duration on the signal-to-noise ratio of images from photostimulable phosphor plates processed using DenOptix and ScanX systems.
    Ramamurthy R; Canning CF; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):307-11. PubMed ID: 15585807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital radiography: analyzing the benefits.
    Jablow M
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2012 Feb; 33(2):142-3. PubMed ID: 22545432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of photostimulable phosphor plate image artifacts in an oral and maxillofacial radiology department.
    Chiu HL; Lin SH; Chen CH; Wang WC; Chen JY; Chen YK; Lin LM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):749-56. PubMed ID: 18547836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The DenOptix digital radiographic system.
    Menig JJ
    J Clin Orthod; 1999 Jul; 33(7):407-10. PubMed ID: 10535024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Some current legal issues that may affect oral and maxillofacial radiology. Part 2: digital monitors and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Macdonald-Jankowski DS; Orpe EC
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2007; 73(6):507-11. PubMed ID: 17672955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rating the extent of surface scratches on photostimulable storage phosphor plates in a dental school environment.
    Kalathingal SM; Shrout MK; Comer C; Brady C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Mar; 39(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 20203281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging.
    Baba R; Ueda K; Okabe M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15585803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of scintillator on the modulation transfer function (MTF) of a digital imaging system.
    Farman TT; Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Miller SR; Lempicki A; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 May; 99(5):608-13. PubMed ID: 15829886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative evaluation of film and digital panoramic radiographs in the assessment of position and morphology of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Mahesh MS; Mahima VG; Patil K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 21891889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Filmless radiology--now and in the future.
    Hadley JN
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1998 Oct; 26(10):774-6. PubMed ID: 9879246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bitewing examination with four digital receptors.
    Bahrami G; Hagstrøm C; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):317-21. PubMed ID: 14709607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.