BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25742804)

  • 1. A study of whether automated Diabetic Retinopathy Image Assessment could replace manual grading steps in the English National Screening Programme.
    Kapetanakis VV; Rudnicka AR; Liew G; Owen CG; Lee A; Louw V; Bolter L; Anderson J; Egan C; Salas-Vega S; Rudisill C; Taylor P; Tufail A
    J Med Screen; 2015 Sep; 22(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 25742804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An observational study to assess if automated diabetic retinopathy image assessment software can replace one or more steps of manual imaging grading and to determine their cost-effectiveness.
    Tufail A; Kapetanakis VV; Salas-Vega S; Egan C; Rudisill C; Owen CG; Lee A; Louw V; Anderson J; Liew G; Bolter L; Bailey C; Sadda S; Taylor P; Rudnicka AR
    Health Technol Assess; 2016 Dec; 20(92):1-72. PubMed ID: 27981917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated Diabetic Retinopathy Image Assessment Software: Diagnostic Accuracy and Cost-Effectiveness Compared with Human Graders.
    Tufail A; Rudisill C; Egan C; Kapetanakis VV; Salas-Vega S; Owen CG; Lee A; Louw V; Anderson J; Liew G; Bolter L; Srinivas S; Nittala M; Sadda S; Taylor P; Rudnicka AR
    Ophthalmology; 2017 Mar; 124(3):343-351. PubMed ID: 28024825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective evaluation of an artificial intelligence-enabled algorithm for automated diabetic retinopathy screening of 30 000 patients.
    Heydon P; Egan C; Bolter L; Chambers R; Anderson J; Aldington S; Stratton IM; Scanlon PH; Webster L; Mann S; du Chemin A; Owen CG; Tufail A; Rudnicka AR
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2021 May; 105(5):723-728. PubMed ID: 32606081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative evaluation of digital imaging, retinal photography and optometrist examination in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
    Olson JA; Strachan FM; Hipwell JH; Goatman KA; McHardy KC; Forrester JV; Sharp PF
    Diabet Med; 2003 Jul; 20(7):528-34. PubMed ID: 12823232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grading and disease management in national screening for diabetic retinopathy in England and Wales.
    Harding S; Greenwood R; Aldington S; Gibson J; Owens D; Taylor R; Kohner E; Scanlon P; Leese G;
    Diabet Med; 2003 Dec; 20(12):965-71. PubMed ID: 14632697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Automated Teleretinal Screening Program for Diabetic Retinopathy.
    Walton OB; Garoon RB; Weng CY; Gross J; Young AK; Camero KA; Jin H; Carvounis PE; Coffee RE; Chu YI
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 134(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 26720694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evidence for automated grading in diabetic retinopathy screening.
    Fleming AD; Philip S; Goatman KA; Prescott GJ; Sharp PF; Olson JA
    Curr Diabetes Rev; 2011 Jul; 7(4):246-52. PubMed ID: 21644913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Costs and consequences of automated algorithms versus manual grading for the detection of referable diabetic retinopathy.
    Scotland GS; McNamee P; Fleming AD; Goatman KA; Philip S; Prescott GJ; Sharp PF; Williams GJ; Wykes W; Leese GP; Olson JA;
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jun; 94(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 19965826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The efficacy of automated "disease/no disease" grading for diabetic retinopathy in a systematic screening programme.
    Philip S; Fleming AD; Goatman KA; Fonseca S; McNamee P; Scotland GS; Prescott GJ; Sharp PF; Olson JA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 91(11):1512-7. PubMed ID: 17504851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of automated disease detection in diabetic retinopathy screening using two-field photography.
    Goatman K; Charnley A; Webster L; Nussey S
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e27524. PubMed ID: 22174741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy and reliability of retinal photo grading for diabetic retinopathy: Remote graders from a developing country and standard retinal photo grader in Australia.
    Islam FMA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179310. PubMed ID: 28632764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness and safety of screening for diabetic retinopathy with two nonmydriatic digital images compared with the seven standard stereoscopic photographic fields.
    Boucher MC; Gresset JA; Angioi K; Olivier S
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):557-68. PubMed ID: 14740797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic accuracy of diabetic retinopathy grading by an artificial intelligence-enabled algorithm compared with a human standard for wide-field true-colour confocal scanning and standard digital retinal images.
    Olvera-Barrios A; Heeren TF; Balaskas K; Chambers R; Bolter L; Egan C; Tufail A; Anderson J
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 105(2):265-270. PubMed ID: 32376611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of automated image analysis software for the detection of diabetic retinopathy to reduce the ophthalmologists' workload.
    Soto-Pedre E; Navea A; Millan S; Hernaez-Ortega MC; Morales J; Desco MC; Pérez P
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Feb; 93(1):e52-6. PubMed ID: 24975456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of haemorrhage and exudate detection in automated grading of diabetic retinopathy.
    Fleming AD; Goatman KA; Philip S; Williams GJ; Prescott GJ; Scotland GS; McNamee P; Leese GP; Wykes WN; Sharp PF; Olson JA;
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jun; 94(6):706-11. PubMed ID: 19661069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of implementing automated grading within the national screening programme for diabetic retinopathy in Scotland.
    Scotland GS; McNamee P; Philip S; Fleming AD; Goatman KA; Prescott GJ; Fonseca S; Sharp PF; Olson JA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 91(11):1518-23. PubMed ID: 17585001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving the economic value of photographic screening for optical coherence tomography-detectable macular oedema: a prospective, multicentre, UK study.
    Olson J; Sharp P; Goatman K; Prescott G; Scotland G; Fleming A; Philip S; Santiago C; Borooah S; Broadbent D; Chong V; Dodson P; Harding S; Leese G; Styles C; Swa K; Wharton H
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Nov; 17(51):1-142. PubMed ID: 24225334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Agreement between photographic screening and hospital biomicroscopy grading of diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy.
    Healy R; Sallam A; Jones V; Donachie PH; Scanlon PH; Stratton IM; Johnston RL
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2014; 24(4):550-8. PubMed ID: 24338579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated detection of diabetic retinopathy: results of a screening study.
    Bouhaimed M; Gibbins R; Owens D
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2008 Apr; 10(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 18260777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.