These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25743748)
61. The Cosmetics Europe strategy for animal-free genotoxicity testing: project status up-date. Pfuhler S; Fautz R; Ouedraogo G; Latil A; Kenny J; Moore C; Diembeck W; Hewitt NJ; Reisinger K; Barroso J Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Feb; 28(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 23811264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Predicting the mutagenic potential of chemicals in tobacco products using Goel R; Valerio LG Toxicol Mech Methods; 2020 Nov; 30(9):672-678. PubMed ID: 32752976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Amended final report on the safety assessment of polyacrylamide and acrylamide residues in cosmetics. Int J Toxicol; 2005; 24 Suppl 2():21-50. PubMed ID: 16154914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Final report on the amended safety assessment of diisopropyl dimer dilinoleate, dicetearyl dimer dilinoleate, diisostearyl dimer dilinoleate, dioctyl dimer dilinoleate, dioctyldodecyl dimer dilinoleate, and ditridecyl dimer dilinoleate. Fiume MZ; Int J Toxicol; 2003; 22 Suppl 2():45-61. PubMed ID: 14555419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Final amended report on the safety assessment of Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Butylparaben, Isobutylparaben, and Benzylparaben as used in cosmetic products. Int J Toxicol; 2008; 27 Suppl 4():1-82. PubMed ID: 19101832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Use of in silico models for prioritization of heat-induced food contaminants in mutagenicity and carcinogenicity testing. Frenzel F; Buhrke T; Wenzel I; Andrack J; Hielscher J; Lampen A Arch Toxicol; 2017 Sep; 91(9):3157-3174. PubMed ID: 28091709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Assessing the impact of expert knowledge on ICH M7 (Q)SAR predictions. Is expert review still needed? Jayasekara PS; Skanchy SK; Kim MT; Kumaran G; Mugabe BE; Woodard LE; Yang J; Zych AJ; Kruhlak NL Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Oct; 125():105006. PubMed ID: 34273441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. (Q)SAR tools for priority setting: A case study with printed paper and board food contact material substances. Van Bossuyt M; Van Hoeck E; Raitano G; Manganelli S; Braeken E; Ates G; Vanhaecke T; Van Miert S; Benfenati E; Mertens B; Rogiers V Food Chem Toxicol; 2017 Apr; 102():109-119. PubMed ID: 28163056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Final report on the safety assessment of Hexamidine and Hexamidine Diisethionate. Int J Toxicol; 2007; 26 Suppl 3():79-88. PubMed ID: 18273451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Structure-based methods for predicting mutagenicity and carcinogenicity: are we there yet? Richard AM Mutat Res; 1998 May; 400(1-2):493-507. PubMed ID: 9685707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Safety assessment of poloxamers 101, 105, 108, 122, 123, 124, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 188, 212, 215, 217, 231, 234, 235, 237, 238, 282, 284, 288, 331, 333, 334, 335, 338, 401, 402, 403, and 407, poloxamer 105 benzoate, and poloxamer 182 dibenzoate as used in cosmetics. Singh-Joy SD; McLain VC Int J Toxicol; 2008; 27 Suppl 2():93-128. PubMed ID: 18830866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Final report on the safety assessment of Triethylene Glycol and PEG-4. Int J Toxicol; 2006; 25 Suppl 2():121-38. PubMed ID: 17090481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. The development of RAD51C, Cystatin A, p53 and Nrf2 luciferase-reporter assays in metabolically competent HepG2 cells for the assessment of mechanism-based genotoxicity and of oxidative stress in the early research phase of drug development. Westerink WM; Stevenson JC; Horbach GJ; Schoonen WG Mutat Res; 2010 Feb; 696(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 20006733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Safety assessment of personal care products/cosmetics and their ingredients. Nohynek GJ; Antignac E; Re T; Toutain H Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 243(2):239-59. PubMed ID: 20005888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling. Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. An evaluation of the sensitivity of the Ames assay to discern low-level mutagenic impurities. Kenyon MO; Cheung JR; Dobo KL; Ku WW Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Jun; 48(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 17379368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Knowledge-based expert systems for toxicity and metabolism prediction: DEREK, StAR and METEOR. Greene N; Judson PN; Langowski JJ; Marchant CA SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1999; 10(2-3):299-314. PubMed ID: 10491855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing. Thybaud V; Aardema M; Clements J; Dearfield K; Galloway S; Hayashi M; Jacobson-Kram D; Kirkland D; MacGregor JT; Marzin D; Ohyama W; Schuler M; Suzuki H; Zeiger E; Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17126066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]