147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25744458)
1. The accuracy of Japanese claims data in identifying breast cancer cases.
Sato I; Yagata H; Ohashi Y
Biol Pharm Bull; 2015; 38(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 25744458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Performance evaluation of hospital claims database for the identification of incident central nervous system tumors compared with a cancer registry in Gironde, France, 2004].
Coureau G; Baldi I; Savès M; Jaffré A; Barat C; Gruber A; Loiseau H; Kostrzewa A; Servas V; Salamon R; Gilleron V
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Aug; 60(4):295-304. PubMed ID: 22704681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of Japanese claims data in identifying diabetes-related complications.
Fujihara K; Yamada-Harada M; Matsubayashi Y; Kitazawa M; Yamamoto M; Yaguchi Y; Seida H; Kodama S; Akazawa K; Sone H
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2021 May; 30(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 33629363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of claims-based definitions of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in Medicare patients.
Li Q; Glynn RJ; Dreyer NA; Liu J; Mogun H; Setoguchi S
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2011 Jul; 20(7):700-8. PubMed ID: 21608070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Agreement of diagnosis and its date for hematologic malignancies and solid tumors between medicare claims and cancer registry data.
Setoguchi S; Solomon DH; Glynn RJ; Cook EF; Levin R; Schneeweiss S
Cancer Causes Control; 2007 Jun; 18(5):561-9. PubMed ID: 17447148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Completeness of American Cancer Registry Treatment Data: implications for quality of care research.
Mallin K; Palis BE; Watroba N; Stewart AK; Walczak D; Singer J; Barron J; Blumenthal W; Haydu G; Edge SB
J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Mar; 216(3):428-37. PubMed ID: 23357724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Positive predictive value of ICD-10 codes for acute myocardial infarction in Japan: a validation study at a single center.
Ando T; Ooba N; Mochizuki M; Koide D; Kimura K; Lee SL; Setoguchi S; Kubota K
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Nov; 18(1):895. PubMed ID: 30477501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing breast cancer case identification using HMO computerized diagnostic data and SEER data.
Rolnick SJ; Hart G; Barton MB; Herrinton L; Flores SK; Paulsen KJ; Husson G; Harris EL; Geiger AM; Elmore JG; Fletcher SW
Am J Manag Care; 2004 Apr; 10(4):257-62. PubMed ID: 15124502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementation of an algorithm for the identification of breast cancer deaths in German health insurance claims data: a validation study based on a record linkage with administrative mortality data.
Langner I; Ohlmeier C; Haug U; Hense HW; Czwikla J; Zeeb H
BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e026834. PubMed ID: 31350240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ability of Medicaid claims data to identify incident cases of breast cancer in the Ohio Medicaid population.
Koroukian SM; Cooper GS; Rimm AA
Health Serv Res; 2003 Jun; 38(3):947-60. PubMed ID: 12822920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying incident colorectal and lung cancer cases in health service utilisation databases in Australia: a validation study.
Goldsbury D; Weber M; Yap S; Banks E; O'Connell DL; Canfell K
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Feb; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28241763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Claims data linked to hospital registry data enhance evaluation of the quality of care of breast cancer.
Meguerditchian AN; Stewart A; Roistacher J; Watroba N; Cropp M; Edge SB
J Surg Oncol; 2010 Jun; 101(7):593-9. PubMed ID: 20461766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ascertaining invasive breast cancer cases; the validity of administrative and self-reported data sources in Australia.
Kemp A; Preen DB; Saunders C; Holman CD; Bulsara M; Rogers K; Roughead EE
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Feb; 13():17. PubMed ID: 23399047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast cancer incidence using administrative data: correction with sensitivity and specificity.
Couris CM; Polazzi S; Olive F; Remontet L; Bossard N; Gomez F; Schott AM; Mitton N; Colonna M; Trombert B
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):660-6. PubMed ID: 19070463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of Medicare claims-based diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: estimating positive predictive value on the basis of review of hospital records.
Kiyota Y; Schneeweiss S; Glynn RJ; Cannuscio CC; Avorn J; Solomon DH
Am Heart J; 2004 Jul; 148(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 15215798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An Evaluation of Algorithms for Identifying Metastatic Breast, Lung, or Colorectal Cancer in Administrative Claims Data.
Whyte JL; Engel-Nitz NM; Teitelbaum A; Gomez Rey G; Kallich JD
Med Care; 2015 Jul; 53(7):e49-57. PubMed ID: 23524464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of algorithms for identifying patients with Crohn's disease in the Japanese health insurance claims database.
Morikubo H; Kobayashi T; Fukuda T; Nagahama T; Hisamatsu T; Hibi T
PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258537. PubMed ID: 34644342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An algorithm for the use of Medicare claims data to identify women with incident breast cancer.
Nattinger AB; Laud PW; Bajorunaite R; Sparapani RA; Freeman JL
Health Serv Res; 2004 Dec; 39(6 Pt 1):1733-49. PubMed ID: 15533184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validating the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke in a National Health Insurance claims database.
Hsieh CY; Chen CH; Li CY; Lai ML
J Formos Med Assoc; 2015 Mar; 114(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 24140108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Defining care provided for breast cancer based on medical record review or Medicare claims: information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Patterns of Care Study.
Fleming ST; Kimmick GG; Sabatino SA; Cress RD; Wu XC; Trentham-Dietz A; Huang B; Hwang W; Liff JM;
Ann Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 22(11):807-13. PubMed ID: 22948184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
