These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25744969)

  • 1. The Missing=Smoking Assumption: A Fallacy in Internet-Based Smoking Cessation Trials?
    Blankers M; Smit ES; van der Pol P; de Vries H; Hoving C; van Laar M
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2016 Jan; 18(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 25744969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why assigning ongoing tobacco use is not necessarily a conservative approach to handling missing tobacco cessation outcomes.
    Nelson DB; Partin MR; Fu SS; Joseph AM; An LC
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2009 Jan; 11(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 19246444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing missing data assumptions in longitudinal studies: an example using a smoking cessation trial.
    Yang X; Shoptaw S
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2005 Mar; 77(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 15734221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of binary outcomes with missing data: missing = smoking, last observation carried forward, and a little multiple imputation.
    Hedeker D; Mermelstein RJ; Demirtas H
    Addiction; 2007 Oct; 102(10):1564-73. PubMed ID: 17854333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is using multiple imputation better than complete case analysis for estimating a prevalence (risk) difference in randomized controlled trials when binary outcome observations are missing?
    Mukaka M; White SA; Terlouw DJ; Mwapasa V; Kalilani-Phiri L; Faragher EB
    Trials; 2016 Jul; 17():341. PubMed ID: 27450066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Missing data assumptions and methods in a smoking cessation study.
    Barnes SA; Larsen MD; Schroeder D; Hanson A; Decker PA
    Addiction; 2010 Mar; 105(3):431-7. PubMed ID: 20402986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple imputation compared with some informative dropout procedures in the estimation and comparison of rates of change in longitudinal clinical trials with dropouts.
    Ali MW; Siddiqui O
    J Biopharm Stat; 2000 May; 10(2):165-81. PubMed ID: 10803723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imputation-based strategies for clinical trial longitudinal data with nonignorable missing values.
    Yang X; Li J; Shoptaw S
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(15):2826-49. PubMed ID: 18205247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Missing continuous outcomes under covariate dependent missingness in cluster randomised trials.
    Hossain A; Diaz-Ordaz K; Bartlett JW
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Jun; 26(3):1543-1562. PubMed ID: 27177885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Handling trial participants with missing outcome data when conducting a meta-analysis: a systematic survey of proposed approaches.
    Akl EA; Kahale LA; Agoritsas T; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Carrasco-Labra A; Ebrahim S; Johnston BC; Neumann I; Sola I; Sun X; Vandvik P; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt G
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jul; 4():98. PubMed ID: 26202162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An exploration of the missing data mechanism in an Internet based smoking cessation trial.
    Jackson D; Mason D; White IR; Sutton S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Oct; 12():157. PubMed ID: 23067272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An overview of practical approaches for handling missing data in clinical trials.
    DeSouza CM; Legedza AT; Sankoh AJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Nov; 19(6):1055-73. PubMed ID: 20183464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of self-report and biochemically verified tobacco abstinence outcomes with missing data: a sensitivity analysis using two-stage imputation.
    Zhang Y; Luo X; Le CT; Ahluwalia JS; Thomas JL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):170. PubMed ID: 30563473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simulation-based study comparing multiple imputation methods for non-monotone missing ordinal data in longitudinal settings.
    Donneau AF; Mauer M; Lambert P; Molenberghs G; Albert A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):570-601. PubMed ID: 24905056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple imputation methods for bivariate outcomes in cluster randomised trials.
    DiazOrdaz K; Kenward MG; Gomes M; Grieve R
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3482-96. PubMed ID: 26990655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Missing Data in Alcohol Clinical Trials with Binary Outcomes.
    Hallgren KA; Witkiewitz K; Kranzler HR; Falk DE; Litten RZ; O'Malley SS; Anton RF;
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2016 Jul; 40(7):1548-57. PubMed ID: 27254113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of data analysis strategies for intent-to-treat analysis in pre-test-post-test designs with substantial dropout rates.
    Salim A; Mackinnon A; Christensen H; Griffiths K
    Psychiatry Res; 2008 Sep; 160(3):335-45. PubMed ID: 18718673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dealing with missing outcome data in randomized trials and observational studies.
    Groenwold RH; Donders AR; Roes KC; Harrell FE; Moons KG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 175(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 22262640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On analysis of longitudinal clinical trials with missing data using reference-based imputation.
    Liu GF; Pang L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(5):924-36. PubMed ID: 26418282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How should we deal with missing data in clinical trials involving Alzheimer's disease patients?
    Coley N; Gardette V; Cantet C; Gillette-Guyonnet S; Nourhashemi F; Vellas B; Andrieu S
    Curr Alzheimer Res; 2011 Jun; 8(4):421-33. PubMed ID: 21244348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.