These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Optotype and grating visual acuity in patients with ocular and cerebral visual impairment. Stiers P; Vanderkelen R; Vandenbussche E Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Dec; 45(12):4333-9. PubMed ID: 15557440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of contrast sensitivity and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates in normal humans. Ridder WH Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 139(3):207-219. PubMed ID: 31414313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imitating the effect of amblyopia on VEP-based acuity estimates. Heinrich SP; Bock CM; Bach M Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 133(3):183-187. PubMed ID: 27864655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Objective measurement of visual resolution using the P300 to self-facial images. Marhöfer DJ; Bach M; Heinrich SP Doc Ophthalmol; 2015 Oct; 131(2):137-48. PubMed ID: 25976745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. "Cognitive" visual acuity estimation based on the event-related potential P300 component. Heinrich SP; Marhöfer D; Bach M Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Sep; 121(9):1464-1472. PubMed ID: 20399706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optotype and grating visual acuity in preschool children. Stiers P; Vanderkelen R; Vandenbussche E Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Sep; 44(9):4123-30. PubMed ID: 12939336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Resolution acuity versus recognition acuity with Landolt-style optotypes. Heinrich SP; Bach M Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Sep; 251(9):2235-41. PubMed ID: 23828648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Measuring vernier acuity and motion perception with the parameter sweep VEP]. Wesemann W; Norcia AM; Manny RE Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1996 Jan; 208(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 8839339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection and resolution of vanishing optotype letters in central and peripheral vision. Demirel S; Anderson RS; Dakin SC; Thibos LN Vision Res; 2012 Apr; 59():9-16. PubMed ID: 22406660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of VEP Vernier acuity and grating acuity in human infants. Skoczenski AM; Norcia AM Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Sep; 40(10):2411-7. PubMed ID: 10476810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a visual acuity test using closed Landolt-Cs to determine malingering. Kröger N; Jürgens C; Kohlmann T; Tost F Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 255(12):2459-2465. PubMed ID: 29046952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual outcome after contact lens and intraocular lens correction of neonatal monocular aphakia in monkeys. Boothe RG; Louden T; Aiyer A; Izquierdo A; Drews C; Lambert SR Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jan; 41(1):110-9. PubMed ID: 10634609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Auditory and visual P300 reflecting cognitive improvement in patients with schizophrenia with quetiapine: a pilot study. Park EJ; Han SI; Jeon YW Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2010 May; 34(4):674-80. PubMed ID: 20304022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of visual acuity measurement with Landolt rings versus numbers]. Rohrschneider K; Spittler AR; Bach M Ophthalmologe; 2019 Nov; 116(11):1058-1063. PubMed ID: 30927070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Study of the visual deficits pattern in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia]. Gong JW; Sun ZH; Wang LP; Shentu XC; Song FW Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 49(7):615-20. PubMed ID: 24257357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contour interaction in the preschool child. Fern KD; Manny RE; Davis JR; Gibson RR Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 May; 63(5):313-8. PubMed ID: 3717283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Small and large field grating acuity versus recognition acuity in different groups of amblyopic patients. Jänicke B; Schultz E Strabismus; 1994; 2(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 21314519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]