274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25746437)
1. An accurate metalloprotein-specific scoring function and molecular docking program devised by a dynamic sampling and iteration optimization strategy.
Bai F; Liao S; Gu J; Jiang H; Wang X; Li H
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Apr; 55(4):833-47. PubMed ID: 25746437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Toward on-the-fly quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) docking: development and benchmark of a scoring function.
Chaskar P; Zoete V; Röhrig UF
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Nov; 54(11):3137-52. PubMed ID: 25296988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative Assessment of Seven Docking Programs on a Nonredundant Metalloprotein Subset of the PDBbind Refined.
Çınaroğlu SS; Timuçin E
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Sep; 59(9):3846-3859. PubMed ID: 31460757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fast docking using the CHARMM force field with EADock DSS.
Grosdidier A; Zoete V; Michielin O
J Comput Chem; 2011 Jul; 32(10):2149-59. PubMed ID: 21541955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computational protocol for predicting the binding affinities of zinc containing metalloprotein-ligand complexes.
Jain T; Jayaram B
Proteins; 2007 Jun; 67(4):1167-78. PubMed ID: 17380508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Target-specific native/decoy pose classifier improves the accuracy of ligand ranking in the CSAR 2013 benchmark.
Fourches D; Politi R; Tropsha A
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jan; 55(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 25521713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing.
Luo Q; Zhao L; Hu J; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171433. PubMed ID: 28196116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. GPDOCK: highly accurate docking strategy for metalloproteins based on geometric probability.
Wang K
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Jan; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 36642411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Docking studies of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors: zinc parameter optimization to improve the binding free energy prediction.
Hu X; Shelver WH
J Mol Graph Model; 2003 Nov; 22(2):115-26. PubMed ID: 12932782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advances in Docking.
Sulimov VB; Kutov DC; Sulimov AV
Curr Med Chem; 2019; 26(42):7555-7580. PubMed ID: 30182836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. FlexAID: Revisiting Docking on Non-Native-Complex Structures.
Gaudreault F; Najmanovich RJ
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1323-36. PubMed ID: 26076070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing sixteen scoring functions for predicting biological activities of ligands for protein targets.
Xu W; Lucke AJ; Fairlie DP
J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Apr; 57():76-88. PubMed ID: 25682361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unlocking Precision Docking for Metalloproteins.
Clemente CM; Prieto JM; Martí M
J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Mar; 64(5):1581-1592. PubMed ID: 38373276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
Perola E; Walters WP; Charifson PS
Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 15211508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A combination of docking, QM/MM methods, and MD simulation for binding affinity estimation of metalloprotein ligands.
Khandelwal A; Lukacova V; Comez D; Kroll DM; Raha S; Balaz S
J Med Chem; 2005 Aug; 48(17):5437-47. PubMed ID: 16107143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms.
Kontoyianni M; McClellan LM; Sokol GS
J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 14736237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. GalaxyDock BP2 score: a hybrid scoring function for accurate protein-ligand docking.
Baek M; Shin WH; Chung HW; Seok C
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jul; 31(7):653-666. PubMed ID: 28623486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
