317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25746517)
21. [The intraoperative application of neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant].
Yang H; Tang J; Cao K; Zhu X; Wang Y; Pan T
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 12761943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Threshold dynamics of the auditory nerve electrically evoked compound action potential in implanted children].
Kechiyan DK; Bakhshinyan VV; Tavartkiladze GA
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2020; 85(6):17-22. PubMed ID: 33474911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.
Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparing eSRT and eCAP measurements in pediatric MED-EL cochlear implant users.
Kosaner J; Spitzer P; Bayguzina S; Gultekin M; Behar LA
Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):153-161. PubMed ID: 29291688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the MED-EL standard electrode array.
Brill S; Müller J; Hagen R; Möltner A; Brockmeier SJ; Stark T; Helbig S; Maurer J; Zahnert T; Zierhofer C; Nopp P; Anderson I; Strahl S
Biomed Eng Online; 2009 Dec; 8():40. PubMed ID: 20015362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. SpeedCAP: An Efficient Method for Estimating Neural Activation Patterns Using Electrically Evoked Compound Action-Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.
Garcia C; Deeks JM; Goehring T; Borsetto D; Bance M; Carlyon RP
Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):627-640. PubMed ID: 36477611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Across-site patterns of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude-growth functions in multichannel cochlear implant recipients and the effects of the interphase gap.
Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():50-65. PubMed ID: 27521841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Toward a method of achieving balanced stimulation of bilateral auditory nerves: Evidence from children receiving matched and unmatched bilateral cochlear implants simultaneously.
Tsai P; Wisener N; Papsin BC; Cushing SL; Gordon KA
Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108445. PubMed ID: 35104716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
Thai-Van H; Truy E; Charasse B; Boutitie F; Chanal JM; Cochard N; Piron JP; Ribas S; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Mondain M; Uziel A; Collet L
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the Nucleus24 cochlear implants].
Tian Y; Li W; Wang Z; Yang N; Hui L; Jiang X
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 26(22):1014-6, 1019. PubMed ID: 23379111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Differences between electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and behavioral measures in children with cochlear implants operated in the school age vs. operated in the first years of life.
Vlahović S; Šindija B; Aras I; Glunčić M; Trotić R
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 May; 76(5):731-9. PubMed ID: 22398117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Intraoperative findings on ECAP-measurement: normal or special case?
Müller A; Hocke T; Mir-Salim P
Int J Audiol; 2015 Apr; 54(4):257-64. PubMed ID: 25421058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does pediatric cochlear implant insertion technique affect intraoperative neural response telemetry thresholds?
Poley M; Overmyer E; Craun P; Holcomb M; Reilly B; White D; Preciado D
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1404-7. PubMed ID: 26166451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. From nucleus 24 to 513: changing cochlear implant design affects auditory response thresholds.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):436-42. PubMed ID: 23370566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evoked stapedius reflex and compound action potential thresholds versus most comfortable loudness level: assessment of their relation for charge-based fitting strategies in implant users.
Walkowiak A; Lorens A; Polak M; Kostek B; Skarzynski H; Szkielkowska A; Skarzynski PH
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2011; 73(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 21659787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of Two Measurement Paradigms to Determine Electrically Evoked Cochlear Nerve Responses and Their Correlation to Cochlear Nerve Cross-section in Infants and Young Children With Cochlear Implant.
Schrank L; Nachtigäller P; Müller J; Hempel JM; Canis M; Spiegel JL; Rader T
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar; 45(3):e206-e213. PubMed ID: 38361306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
