148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25746913)
1. Assessing temporal modulation sensitivity using electrically evoked auditory steady state responses.
Luke R; Van Deun L; Hofmann M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():37-45. PubMed ID: 25746913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrically evoked auditory steady state responses in cochlear implant users.
Hofmann M; Wouters J
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 11(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 20033246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Independent component analysis for cochlear implant artifacts attenuation from electrically evoked auditory steady-state response measurements.
Deprez H; Gransier R; Hofmann M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J; Moonen M
J Neural Eng; 2018 Feb; 15(1):016006. PubMed ID: 29211684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved electrically evoked auditory steady-state response thresholds in humans.
Hofmann M; Wouters J
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Aug; 13(4):573-89. PubMed ID: 22569837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrophysiological assessment of temporal envelope processing in cochlear implant users.
Gransier R; Carlyon RP; Wouters J
Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15406. PubMed ID: 32958791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of analysis window on 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users.
David W; Verwaerde E; Gransier R; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2023 Oct; 438():108882. PubMed ID: 37688847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neural Modulation Transmission Is a Marker for Speech Perception in Noise in Cochlear Implant Users.
Gransier R; Luke R; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):591-602. PubMed ID: 31567565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Source analysis of auditory steady-state responses in acoustic and electric hearing.
Luke R; De Vos A; Wouters J
Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():568-576. PubMed ID: 27894891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Age-Related Changes in Temporal Resolution Revisited: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Findings From Cochlear Implant Users.
Mussoi BSS; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1328-1344. PubMed ID: 31033701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Amplitude Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition in Late-Implanted Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Users.
De Ruiter AM; Debruyne JA; Chenault MN; Francart T; Brokx JP
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 25851075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of site-specific level adjustments on speech recognition with cochlear implants.
Zhou N; Pfingst BE
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 24225651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of an artifact reduction strategy for electrically evoked auditory steady-state responses: Simulations and measurements.
Bahmer A; Pieper S; Baumann U
J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Feb; 296():57-68. PubMed ID: 29291927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Across-site patterns of modulation detection: relation to speech recognition.
Garadat SN; Zwolan TA; Pfingst BE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4030-41. PubMed ID: 22559376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of stimulation rate, mode and level on modulation detection by cochlear implant users.
Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Sep; 6(3):269-79. PubMed ID: 16075190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of slow temporal modulations in speech identification for cochlear implant users.
Gnansia D; Lazard DS; Léger AC; Fugain C; Lancelin D; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 24195655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
