These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Model for the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxometry of hydrated porous silicate materials. Faux DA; Cachia SH; McDonald PJ; Bhatt JS; Howlett NC; Churakov SV Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2015 Mar; 91(3):032311. PubMed ID: 25871114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigating particle size effects on NMR spectra of ions diffusing in porous carbons through a mesoscopic model. Sasikumar A; Merlet C Solid State Nucl Magn Reson; 2023 Aug; 126():101883. PubMed ID: 37329858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of pore-size and shape distributions on diffusion pore imaging by nuclear magnetic resonance. Kuder TA; Laun FB Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2015 Aug; 92(2):022706. PubMed ID: 26382431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 1H and 2H NMR studies of benzene confined in porous solids: melting point depression and pore size distribution. Aksnes DW; Kimtys L Solid State Nucl Magn Reson; 2004 Jan; 25(1-3):146-52. PubMed ID: 14698402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clathrate formation and dissociation in vapor/water/ice/hydrate systems in SBA-15, sol-gel and CPG porous media, as probed by NMR relaxation, novel protocol NMR cryoporometry, neutron scattering and ab initio quantum-mechanical molecular dynamics simulation. Webber JB; Anderson R; Strange JH; Tohidi B Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 May; 25(4):533-6. PubMed ID: 17466781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pore size distribution of bioresorbable films using a 3-D diffusion NMR method. Benjamini D; Elsner JJ; Zilberman M; Nevo U Acta Biomater; 2014 Jun; 10(6):2762-8. PubMed ID: 24534719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interfacial interactions of glutamate, water and ions with carbon nanopore evaluated by molecular dynamics simulations. Cory SM; Liu Y; Glavinović MI Biochim Biophys Acta; 2007 Sep; 1768(9):2319-41. PubMed ID: 17631857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental identification of diffusive coupling using 2D NMR. Song YQ; Carneiro G; Schwartz LM; Johnson DL Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Dec; 113(23):235503. PubMed ID: 25526135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A lattice model for the simulation of one and two dimensional 129Xe exchange spectra produced by translational diffusion. Lin G; Jones AA Solid State Nucl Magn Reson; 2004 Sep; 26(2):87-98. PubMed ID: 15276639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploring the surface permeability of nanoporous particles by pulsed field gradient NMR. Krutyeva M; Yang X; Vasenkov S; Kärger J J Magn Reson; 2007 Apr; 185(2):300-7. PubMed ID: 17270475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional diffusion of non-sorbing species in porous sandstone: computer simulation based on X-ray microtomography using synchrotron radiation. Nakashima Y; Nakano T; Nakamura K; Uesugi K; Tsuchiyama A; Ikeda S J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Oct; 74(1-4):253-64. PubMed ID: 15358495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pore size distribution and supercritical hydrogen adsorption in activated carbon fibers. Purewal JJ; Kabbour H; Vajo JJ; Ahn CC; Fultz B Nanotechnology; 2009 May; 20(20):204012. PubMed ID: 19420660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Restricted diffusion and exchange of water in porous media: average structure determination and size distribution resolved from the effect of local field gradients on the proton NMR spectrum. Kuntz JF; Palmas P; Level V; Canet D J Magn Reson; 2008 Apr; 191(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 18222101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]