These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. How much information can be obtained from tracking the position of the leading edge in a scratch assay? Johnston ST; Simpson MJ; McElwain DL J R Soc Interface; 2014 Aug; 11(97):20140325. PubMed ID: 24850906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating cell diffusivity and cell proliferation rate by interpreting IncuCyte ZOOM™ assay data using the Fisher-Kolmogorov model. Johnston ST; Shah ET; Chopin LK; Sean McElwain DL; Simpson MJ BMC Syst Biol; 2015 Jul; 9():38. PubMed ID: 26188761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are in vitro estimates of cell diffusivity and cell proliferation rate sensitive to assay geometry? Treloar KK; Simpson MJ; McElwain DL; Baker RE J Theor Biol; 2014 Sep; 356():71-84. PubMed ID: 24787651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uncertainty quantification, propagation and characterization by Bayesian analysis combined with global sensitivity analysis applied to dynamical intracellular pathway models. Eriksson O; Jauhiainen A; Maad Sasane S; Kramer A; Nair AG; Sartorius C; Hellgren Kotaleski J Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 35(2):284-292. PubMed ID: 30010712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Towards efficient uncertainty quantification in complex and large-scale biomechanical problems based on a Bayesian multi-fidelity scheme. Biehler J; Gee MW; Wall WA Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Jun; 14(3):489-513. PubMed ID: 25245816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantifying the roles of random motility and directed motility using advection-diffusion theory for a 3T3 fibroblast cell migration assay stimulated with an electric field. Simpson MJ; Lo KY; Sun YS BMC Syst Biol; 2017 Mar; 11(1):39. PubMed ID: 28302111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using a continuum model to decipher the mechanics of embryonic tissue spreading from time-lapse image sequences: An approximate Bayesian computation approach. Stepien TL; Lynch HE; Yancey SX; Dempsey L; Davidson LA PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0218021. PubMed ID: 31246967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Approximate Bayesian computation reveals the importance of repeated measurements for parameterising cell-based models of growing tissues. Kursawe J; Baker RE; Fletcher AG J Theor Biol; 2018 Apr; 443():66-81. PubMed ID: 29391171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants. Park ES; Symanski E; Han D; Spiegelman C Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):51-113. PubMed ID: 26333239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Taking error into account when fitting models using Approximate Bayesian Computation. van der Vaart E; Prangle D; Sibly RM Ecol Appl; 2018 Mar; 28(2):267-274. PubMed ID: 29178336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Approximate Bayesian computation schemes for parameter inference of discrete stochastic models using simulated likelihood density. Wu Q; Smith-Miles K; Tian T BMC Bioinformatics; 2014; 15 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S3. PubMed ID: 25473744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantifying the roles of cell motility and cell proliferation in a circular barrier assay. Simpson MJ; Treloar KK; Binder BJ; Haridas P; Manton KJ; Leavesley DI; McElwain DL; Baker RE J R Soc Interface; 2013 May; 10(82):20130007. PubMed ID: 23427098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]