These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25747441)

  • 41. Kinome-Wide Profiling Prediction of Small Molecules.
    Sorgenfrei FA; Fulle S; Merget B
    ChemMedChem; 2018 Mar; 13(6):495-499. PubMed ID: 28544552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Prediction of interactions between viral and host proteins using supervised machine learning methods.
    Barman RK; Saha S; Das S
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112034. PubMed ID: 25375323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Heterogeneous data integration by tree-augmented naïve Bayes for protein-protein interactions prediction.
    Lin X; Chen XW
    Proteomics; 2013 Jan; 13(2):261-8. PubMed ID: 23112070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Protein-ligand-based pharmacophores: generation and utility assessment in computational ligand profiling.
    Meslamani J; Li J; Sutter J; Stevens A; Bertrand HO; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):943-55. PubMed ID: 22480372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Development and evaluation of in silico prediction model for drug-induced respiratory toxicity by using naïve Bayes classifier method.
    Zhang H; Ma JX; Liu CT; Ren JX; Ding L
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2018 Nov; 121():593-603. PubMed ID: 30261216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Accurate and efficient target prediction using a potency-sensitive influence-relevance voter.
    Lusci A; Browning M; Fooshee D; Swamidass J; Baldi P
    J Cheminform; 2015; 7():63. PubMed ID: 26719774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A hierarchical Naïve Bayes Model for handling sample heterogeneity in classification problems: an application to tissue microarrays.
    Demichelis F; Magni P; Piergiorgi P; Rubin MA; Bellazzi R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Nov; 7():514. PubMed ID: 17125514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Benchmark data sets for structure-based computational target prediction.
    Schomburg KT; Rarey M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Aug; 54(8):2261-74. PubMed ID: 25084060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Chemogenomic Active Learning's Domain of Applicability on Small, Sparse qHTS Matrices: A Study Using Cytochrome P450 and Nuclear Hormone Receptor Families.
    Rakers C; Najnin RA; Polash AH; Takeda S; Brown JB
    ChemMedChem; 2018 Mar; 13(6):511-521. PubMed ID: 29211346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. AlzhCPI: A knowledge base for predicting chemical-protein interactions towards Alzheimer's disease.
    Fang J; Wang L; Li Y; Lian W; Pang X; Wang H; Yuan D; Wang Q; Liu AL; Du GH
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0178347. PubMed ID: 28542505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. On the importance of composite protein multiple ligand interactions in protein pockets.
    Tonddast-Navaei S; Srinivasan B; Skolnick J
    J Comput Chem; 2017 Jun; 38(15):1252-1259. PubMed ID: 27864975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparative Analysis of QSAR-based vs. Chemical Similarity Based Predictors of GPCRs Binding Affinity.
    Luo M; Wang XS; Tropsha A
    Mol Inform; 2016 Jan; 35(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 27491652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Consensus scoring criteria for improving enrichment in virtual screening.
    Yang JM; Chen YF; Shen TW; Kristal BS; Hsu DF
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):1134-46. PubMed ID: 16045308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Strategies for small molecule library design.
    Sheppard DW; Lipkin MJ; Harris CJ; Catana C; Stouten PF
    Curr Pharm Des; 2014; 20(20):3314-22. PubMed ID: 23947648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Structure-based druggability assessment--identifying suitable targets for small molecule therapeutics.
    Fauman EB; Rai BK; Huang ES
    Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2011 Aug; 15(4):463-8. PubMed ID: 21704549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A naive Bayes model to predict coupling between seven transmembrane domain receptors and G-proteins.
    Cao J; Panetta R; Yue S; Steyaert A; Young-Bellido M; Ahmad S
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jan; 19(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 12538244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Heterogeneous classifier fusion for ligand-based virtual screening: or, how decision making by committee can be a good thing.
    Riniker S; Fechner N; Landrum GA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):2829-36. PubMed ID: 24171408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A nearest neighbor algorithm based predictor for the prediction of enzyme-small molecule interaction.
    Hu LL; He ZS; Shi XH; Kong XY; Li HP; Lu WC
    Protein Pept Lett; 2012 Jan; 19(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 21919855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Can we trust docking results? Evaluation of seven commonly used programs on PDBbind database.
    Plewczynski D; Łaźniewski M; Augustyniak R; Ginalski K
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Mar; 32(4):742-55. PubMed ID: 20812323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.