These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25747613)

  • 1. External radiation dose estimation by the basic survey.
    Ishikawa T; Yasumura S; Ohtsuru A; Sakai A; Ohira T; Kamiya K; Abe M
    Fukushima J Med Sci; 2014; 60(2):207. PubMed ID: 25747613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The latest update on individual external doses in an early stage after the Fukushima nuclear accident.
    Ishikawa T; Yasumura S; Akahane K; Yonai S; Ohtsuru A; Sakai A; Sakata R; Ohira T; Kamiya K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 187(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 31867629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation Doses and Associated Risk From the Fukushima Nuclear Accident.
    Ishikawa T
    Asia Pac J Public Health; 2017 Mar; 29(2_suppl):18S-28S. PubMed ID: 28330389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Absorbed dose rate in air in metropolitan Tokyo before the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident.
    Inoue K; Hosoda M; Fukushi M; Furukawa M; Tokonami S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Nov; 167(1-3):231-4. PubMed ID: 25944962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessments of DNA Damage and Radiation Exposure Dose in Cattle Living in the Contaminated Area Caused by the Fukushima Nuclear Accident.
    Sato I; Sasaki J; Satoh H; Natsuhori M; Murata T; Okada K
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2020 Sep; 105(3):496-501. PubMed ID: 32844262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reconstructing the Linear No-Threshold Model in Japan: A Historical Perspective on the Technics of Evaluating Radiation Exposure.
    Onaga L
    Technol Cult; 2017; 58(1):194-205. PubMed ID: 28569712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AGE DEPENDENCE OF INDIVIDUAL EXTERNAL DOSES IN AN EARLY STAGE AFTER THE FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR ACCIDENT.
    Ishikawa T; Yasumura S; Akahane K; Yonai S; Ohtsuru A; Sakai A; Ohira T; Kamiya K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jun; 188(2):238-245. PubMed ID: 31875902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Epidemic of fear.
    Normile D
    Science; 2016 Mar; 351(6277):1022-3. PubMed ID: 26941301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Measures against Radiation Exposure Due to Large-Scale Nuclear Accident in Distant Place--Radioactive Materials in Nagasaki from Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant].
    Yuan J; Sera K; Takatsuji T
    Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2015; 70(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 25994347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of absorbed radiation dose rates in wild rodents inhabiting a site severely contaminated by the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident.
    Kubota Y; Takahashi H; Watanabe Y; Fuma S; Kawaguchi I; Aoki M; Kubota M; Furuhata Y; Shigemura Y; Yamada F; Ishikawa T; Obara S; Yoshida S
    J Environ Radioact; 2015 Apr; 142():124-31. PubMed ID: 25666988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fact-finding Survey in Response to the Manipulation of Personal Alarm Dosimeter Collection Efficiency: Lessons Learned About Post-Emergency Radiation Protection from the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi APP Accident.
    Yasui S
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(6):D96-102. PubMed ID: 25617063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk Perception and Risk Talk: The Case of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Radiation Risk.
    Kusumi T; Hirayama R; Kashima Y
    Risk Anal; 2017 Dec; 37(12):2305-2320. PubMed ID: 28581037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An assessment of the doses received by members of the public in Japan following the nuclear accident at Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.
    Bedwell P; Mortimer K; Wellings J; Sherwood J; Leadbetter SJ; Haywood SM; Charnock T; Jones AR; Hort MC
    J Radiol Prot; 2015 Dec; 35(4):869-90. PubMed ID: 26609838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing cost and effectiveness of radiation decontamination in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan.
    Yasutaka T; Naito W
    J Environ Radioact; 2016 Jan; 151 Pt 2():512-20. PubMed ID: 26051754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Seven years post-Fukushima: long-term measurement of exposure doses in Tomioka Town.
    Tsukazaki A; Taira Y; Orita M; Takamura N
    J Radiat Res; 2019 Jan; 60(1):159-160. PubMed ID: 30395295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Has pediatric CT practice in Japan changed since the Fukushima nuclear disaster?
    Miyazaki O
    Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Sep; 45(10):1571-4. PubMed ID: 25792153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A framework for estimating radiation-related cancer risks in Japan from the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident.
    Walsh L; Zhang W; Shore RE; Auvinen A; Laurier D; Wakeford R; Jacob P; Gent N; Anspaugh LR; Schüz J; Kesminiene A; van Deventer E; Tritscher A; del Rosarion Pérez M
    Radiat Res; 2014 Nov; 182(5):556-72. PubMed ID: 25251702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 250 mSv: temporary increase in the emergency exposure dose limit in response to the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident and its decision making process.
    Yasui S
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(4):D35-42. PubMed ID: 25436995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. After Fukushima: Addressing anxiety.
    Midorikawa S; Suzuki S; Ohtsuru A
    Science; 2016 May; 352(6286):666-7. PubMed ID: 27151857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. After Fukushima: Creating a dialogue.
    Miyazaki M; Tanigawa K; Murakami M
    Science; 2016 May; 352(6286):666. PubMed ID: 27151856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.