These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25747650)

  • 1. Changes in combat task performance under increasing loads in active duty marines.
    Jaworski RL; Jensen A; Niederberger B; Congalton R; Kelly KR
    Mil Med; 2015 Mar; 180(3 Suppl):179-86. PubMed ID: 25747650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance differences between male and female marines on standardized physical fitness tests and combat proxy tasks: identifying the gap.
    Jameson J; Pappa L; McGuire B; Kelly KR
    US Army Med Dep J; 2015; ():12-21. PubMed ID: 26159007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. U.S. Army Physical Demands Study: Differences in Physical Fitness and Occupational Task Performance Between Trainees and Active Duty Soldiers.
    Canino MC; Foulis SA; Zambraski EJ; Cohen BS; Redmond JE; Hauret KG; Frykman PN; Sharp MA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Jul; 33(7):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 29952870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of strength and power during performance of high intensity military tasks under heavy load carriage.
    Mala J; Szivak TK; Flanagan SD; Comstock BA; Laferrier JZ; Maresh CM; Kraemer WJ
    US Army Med Dep J; 2015; ():3-11. PubMed ID: 26101902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preparing for Combat Readiness for the Fight: Physical Performance Profile of Female U.S. Marines.
    Kelly KR; Jameson JT
    J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Mar; 30(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 26605806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of carrying different military equipment during a fatigue test on shooting performance.
    Gil-Cosano JJ; Orantes-Gonzalez E; Heredia-Jimenez J
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2019 Mar; 19(2):186-191. PubMed ID: 30043678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fight load index and body composition are most associated with combat fitness in female Marines.
    Allison KF; Keenan KA; Lovalekar M; Mi Q; Beals K; Coleman LCLC; Nindl BC
    J Sci Med Sport; 2019 Apr; 22(4):494-499. PubMed ID: 30448087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decreased Percent Body Fat but Not Body Mass is Associated with Better Performance on Combat Fitness Test in Male and Female Marines.
    Pletcher ER; Lovalekar M; Coleman LC; Beals K; Nindl BC; Allison KF
    J Strength Cond Res; 2023 Apr; 37(4):887-893. PubMed ID: 36026495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of load carriage on lumbar spine kinematics.
    Rodríguez-Soto AE; Jaworski R; Jensen A; Niederberger B; Hargens AR; Frank LR; Kelly KR; Ward SR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E783-91. PubMed ID: 23524870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Load Carriage on Tactical Performance in Special Weapons and Tactics Operators.
    Thomas M; Pohl MB; Shapiro R; Keeler J; Abel MG
    J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Feb; 32(2):554-564. PubMed ID: 29120978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. U.S. Army Physical Demands Study: Reliability of Simulations of Physically Demanding Tasks Performed by Combat Arms Soldiers.
    Foulis SA; Redmond JE; Frykman PN; Warr BJ; Zambraski EJ; Sharp MA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Dec; 31(12):3245-3252. PubMed ID: 28368954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of Military Load Carriage on Susceptibility to Enemy Fire During Tactical Combat Movements.
    Billing DC; Silk AJ; Tofari PJ; Hunt AP
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S134-8. PubMed ID: 26506176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of load carriage on performance of an explosive, anaerobic military task.
    Treloar AK; Billing DC
    Mil Med; 2011 Sep; 176(9):1027-31. PubMed ID: 21987961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of training with and without a load on military fitness tests and marksmanship.
    Swain DP; Ringleb SI; Naik DN; Butowicz CM
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Jul; 25(7):1857-65. PubMed ID: 21659886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Defining soldier equipment trade space: load effects on combat marksmanship and perception-action coupling.
    Palmer CJ; Bigelow C; Van Emmerik RE
    Ergonomics; 2013; 56(11):1708-21. PubMed ID: 24028557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Comparison of United States Marine Corps Physical Fitness Test and Combat Fitness Test Results.
    Keefer M; Debeliso M
    Int J Exerc Sci; 2020; 13(4):1741-1755. PubMed ID: 33414879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Concept for a Predeployment Assessment of Basic Military Fitness in the German Armed Forces.
    Rohde U; Sievert A; Rüther T; Witzki A; Leyk D
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S211-5. PubMed ID: 26506190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marksmanship deficits caused by an exhaustive whole-body lifting task with and without torso-borne loads.
    Frykman PN; Merullo DJ; Banderet LE; Gregorczyk K; Hasselquist L
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Jul; 26 Suppl 2():S30-6. PubMed ID: 22614225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A descriptive study of the U.S. Marine Corps fitness tests (2000-2012).
    Bartlett JL; Phillips J; Galarneau MR
    Mil Med; 2015 May; 180(5):513-7. PubMed ID: 25939104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association among functional-movement ability, fatigue, sedentary time, and fitness in 40 years and older active duty military personnel.
    Kennedy-Armbruster C; Evans EM; Sexauer L; Peterson J; Wyatt W
    Mil Med; 2013 Dec; 178(12):1358-64. PubMed ID: 24306020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.