These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25748599)

  • 1. The conceptual foundation of environmental decision support.
    Reichert P; Langhans SD; Lienert J; Schuwirth N
    J Environ Manage; 2015 May; 154():316-32. PubMed ID: 25748599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Towards a comprehensive uncertainty assessment in environmental research and decision support.
    Reichert P
    Water Sci Technol; 2020 Apr; 81(8):1588-1596. PubMed ID: 32644952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An enhanced adaptive management approach for remediation of legacy mercury in the South River.
    Foran CM; Baker KM; Grosso NR; Linkov I
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117140. PubMed ID: 25665032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collaborative environmental planning in river management: an application of multicriteria decision analysis in the White River Watershed in Vermont.
    Hermans C; Erickson J; Noordewier T; Sheldon A; Kline M
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 84(4):534-46. PubMed ID: 17029759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of structured decision-making to explicitly incorporate environmental process understanding in management of coastal restoration projects: Case study on barrier islands of the northern Gulf of Mexico.
    Dalyander PS; Meyers M; Mattsson B; Steyer G; Godsey E; McDonald J; Byrnes M; Ford M
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183(Pt 3):497-509. PubMed ID: 27623362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A decision framework for possible remediation of contaminated sediments in the River Kymijoki, Finland.
    Verta M; Kiviranta H; Salo S; Malve O; Korhonen M; Verkasalo PK; Ruokojärvi P; Rossi E; Hanski A; Päätalo K; Vartiainen T
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2009 Jan; 16(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 18941816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrating uncertainty of preferences and predictions in decision models: An application to regional wastewater planning.
    Haag F; Reichert P; Maurer M; Lienert J
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Dec; 252():109652. PubMed ID: 31629174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of information for managing contaminated sediments.
    Bates ME; Sparrevik M; de Lichy N; Linkov I
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9478-85. PubMed ID: 24957130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for evaluating new medicines in Health Technology Assessment and beyond: The Advance Value Framework.
    Angelis A; Kanavos P
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 Sep; 188():137-156. PubMed ID: 28772164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decision making under uncertainty in case of soil remediation.
    Scholz RW; Schnabel U
    J Environ Manage; 2006 Jul; 80(2):132-47. PubMed ID: 16413097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Participatory modelling to support decision making in water management under uncertainty: two comparative case studies in the Guadiana river basin, Spain.
    Carmona G; Varela-Ortega C; Bromley J
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():400-12. PubMed ID: 23792817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An innovative approach to addressing childhood obesity: a knowledge-based infrastructure for supporting multi-stakeholder partnership decision-making in Quebec, Canada.
    Addy NA; Shaban-Nejad A; Buckeridge DL; Dubé L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Jan; 12(2):1314-33. PubMed ID: 25625409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combining ecosystem services assessment with structured decision making to support ecological restoration planning.
    Martin DM; Mazzotta M; Bousquin J
    Environ Manage; 2018 Sep; 62(3):608-618. PubMed ID: 29637276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. River environmental decision support system development for Suzhou Creek in Shanghai.
    Liao Z; Xu Z; Wang D; Lu S; Hannam PM
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Sep; 92(9):2211-21. PubMed ID: 21546149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent developments and applications.
    Linkov I; Satterstrom FK; Kiker G; Batchelor C; Bridges T; Ferguson E
    Environ Int; 2006 Dec; 32(8):1072-93. PubMed ID: 16905190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Precautionary principles: a jurisdiction-free framework for decision-making under risk.
    Ricci PF; Cox LA; MacDonald TR
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2004 Dec; 23(12):579-600. PubMed ID: 15688986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A mixed-methods approach to strategic planning for multi-benefit regional water infrastructure.
    Harris-Lovett S; Lienert J; Sedlak D
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Mar; 233():218-237. PubMed ID: 30580118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multi-criteria decision analysis for integrated water quality assessment and management support.
    Schuwirth N; Honti M; Logar I; Stamm C
    Water Res X; 2018 Dec; 1():100010. PubMed ID: 31194004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incorporating model uncertainty into the evaluation of interventions to reduce microcontaminant loads in rivers.
    Gimeno P; Marcé R; Bosch L; Comas J; Corominas L
    Water Res; 2017 Nov; 124():415-424. PubMed ID: 28783497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.