These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25748599)

  • 21. Stakeholder engagement in dredged material management decisions.
    Collier ZA; Bates ME; Wood MD; Linkov I
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Oct; 496():248-256. PubMed ID: 25089686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quantitative theories for clinical decision making.
    Habbema JD
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1984; 32(3-4):172-80. PubMed ID: 6522731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sustainable water quality management framework and a strategy planning system for a river basin.
    Chen CH; Liu WL; Leu HG
    Environ Manage; 2006 Dec; 38(6):952-73. PubMed ID: 16990981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Four Common Simplifications of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis do not hold for River Rehabilitation.
    Langhans SD; Lienert J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150695. PubMed ID: 26954353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Strategic rehabilitation planning of piped water networks using multi-criteria decision analysis.
    Scholten L; Scheidegger A; Reichert P; Maurer M; Lienert J
    Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():124-43. PubMed ID: 24321248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing multi-criteria decision analysis and integrated assessment to support long-term water supply planning.
    Scholten L; Maurer M; Lienert J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176663. PubMed ID: 28481881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How can we make progress with decision support systems in landscape and river basin management? Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of four different decision support systems.
    Volk M; Lautenbach S; van Delden H; Newham LT; Seppelt R
    Environ Manage; 2010 Dec; 46(6):834-49. PubMed ID: 20033686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A decision support tool to prioritize risk management options for contaminated sites.
    Sorvari J; Seppälä J
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Mar; 408(8):1786-99. PubMed ID: 20138649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of stochastic multi-criteria decision analysis to support sustainable management of contaminated sediments.
    Sparrevik M; Barton DN; Bates ME; Linkov I
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Feb; 46(3):1326-34. PubMed ID: 22191941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A decision support framework for science-based, multi-stakeholder deliberation: a coral reef example.
    Rehr AP; Small MJ; Bradley P; Fisher WS; Vega A; Black K; Stockton T
    Environ Manage; 2012 Dec; 50(6):1204-18. PubMed ID: 23052473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An Integrated Framework for Environmental Multi-Impact Spatial Risk Analysis.
    Ferretti V; Montibeller G
    Risk Anal; 2019 Jan; 39(1):257-273. PubMed ID: 29228503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accounting for substitution and spatial heterogeneity in a labelled choice experiment.
    Lizin S; Brouwer R; Liekens I; Broeckx S
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Oct; 181():289-297. PubMed ID: 27372251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of factors affecting stakeholder risk perception of contaminated sediment disposal in Oslo harbor.
    Sparrevik M; Ellen GJ; Duijn M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 20809566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prioritization of sediment management alternatives using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis.
    Alvarez-Guerra M; Canis L; Voulvoulis N; Viguri JR; Linkov I
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Sep; 408(20):4354-67. PubMed ID: 20673964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prospect theory in the valuation of health.
    Moffett ML; Suarez-Almazor ME
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2005 Aug; 5(4):499-505. PubMed ID: 19807267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. SCORE: a novel multi-criteria decision analysis approach to assessing the sustainability of contaminated land remediation.
    Rosén L; Back PE; Söderqvist T; Norrman J; Brinkhoff P; Norberg T; Volchko Y; Norin M; Bergknut M; Döberl G
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Apr; 511():621-38. PubMed ID: 25594905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Structured decision making as a conceptual framework to identify thresholds for conservation and management.
    Martin J; Runge MC; Nichols JD; Lubow BC; Kendall WL
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Jul; 19(5):1079-90. PubMed ID: 19688917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimating conditional probabilities of terrorist attacks: modeling adversaries with uncertain value tradeoffs.
    Levine ES
    Risk Anal; 2012 Feb; 32(2):294-303. PubMed ID: 21801187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Use of multi-criteria decision analysis in regulatory alternatives analysis: a case study of lead free solder.
    Malloy TF; Sinsheimer PJ; Blake A; Linkov I
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Oct; 9(4):652-64. PubMed ID: 23703936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends.
    Huang IB; Keisler J; Linkov I
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Sep; 409(19):3578-94. PubMed ID: 21764422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.