These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25748826)

  • 1. The impact of symbolic and non-symbolic quantity on spatial learning.
    McCrink K; Galamba J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119395. PubMed ID: 25748826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Non-symbolic numerosities do not automatically activate spatial-numerical associations: Evidence from the SNARC effect.
    Cleland AA; Corsico K; White K; Bull R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Feb; 73(2):295-308. PubMed ID: 31432745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial-numerical associations: Shared symbolic and non-symbolic numerical representations.
    Buijsman S; Tirado C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2423-2436. PubMed ID: 30931820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial bias in symbolic and non-symbolic numerical comparison in neglect.
    Masson N; Pesenti M; Dormal V
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Aug; 51(10):1925-32. PubMed ID: 23774183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-symbolic magnitudes are represented spatially: Evidence from a non-symbolic SNARC task.
    Nemeh F; Humberstone J; Yates MJ; Reeve RA
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0203019. PubMed ID: 30161171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-modal activation of auditory regions during visuo-spatial working memory in early deafness.
    Ding H; Qin W; Liang M; Ming D; Wan B; Li Q; Yu C
    Brain; 2015 Sep; 138(Pt 9):2750-65. PubMed ID: 26070981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural connectivity patterns underlying symbolic number processing indicate mathematical achievement in children.
    Park J; Li R; Brannon EM
    Dev Sci; 2014 Mar; 17(2):187-202. PubMed ID: 24267664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Infants learn better from left to right: a directional bias in infants' sequence learning.
    Bulf H; de Hevia MD; Gariboldi V; Macchi Cassia V
    Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):2437. PubMed ID: 28550288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No inherent left and right side in human 'mental number line': evidence from right brain damage.
    Aiello M; Jacquin-Courtois S; Merola S; Ottaviani T; Tomaiuolo F; Bueti D; Rossetti Y; Doricchi F
    Brain; 2012 Aug; 135(Pt 8):2492-505. PubMed ID: 22577222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Moving attention along the mental number line in preschool age: Study of the operational momentum in 3- to 5-year-old children's non-symbolic arithmetic.
    Haman M; Lipowska K
    Dev Sci; 2021 Jan; 24(1):e13007. PubMed ID: 32567767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence for distinct magnitude systems for symbolic and non-symbolic number.
    Sasanguie D; De Smedt B; Reynvoet B
    Psychol Res; 2017 Jan; 81(1):231-242. PubMed ID: 26708496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rat spatial memory tasks adapted for humans: characterization in subjects with intact brain and subjects with selective medial temporal lobe thermal lesions.
    Bohbot VD; Jech R; Růzicka E; Nadel L; Kalina M; Stepánková K; Bures J
    Physiol Res; 2002; 51 Suppl 1():S49-65. PubMed ID: 12479786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceiving numbers does not cause automatic shifts of spatial attention.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Rotondaro F; Doricchi F
    Cortex; 2015 Dec; 73():298-316. PubMed ID: 26520681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mental movements without magnitude? A study of spatial biases in symbolic arithmetic.
    Pinhas M; Fischer MH
    Cognition; 2008 Dec; 109(3):408-15. PubMed ID: 18976986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Left parietal TMS disturbs priming between symbolic and non-symbolic number representations.
    Sasanguie D; Göbel SM; Reynvoet B
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jul; 51(8):1528-33. PubMed ID: 23665379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial working memory and spatial attention rely on common neural processes in the intraparietal sulcus.
    Silk TJ; Bellgrove MA; Wrafter P; Mattingley JB; Cunnington R
    Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):718-24. PubMed ID: 20615473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and the spatial representation of magnitude.
    Bull R; Benson PJ
    Horm Behav; 2006 Aug; 50(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 16595134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of number magnitude and notation at 7T: separating the neural response to small and large, symbolic and nonsymbolic number.
    He L; Zuo Z; Chen L; Humphreys G
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Aug; 24(8):2199-209. PubMed ID: 23535179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shared spatial representations for numbers and space: the reversal of the SNARC and the Simon effects.
    Notebaert W; Gevers W; Verguts T; Fias W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Oct; 32(5):1197-207. PubMed ID: 17002531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial processing and perceptual sequence learning in SRT tasks.
    Deroost N; Soetens E
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 16610270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.