These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25749089)

  • 41. Effect of implant divergence on the accuracy of definitive casts created from traditional and digital implant-level impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Elathamna EN; Abdel-Azim T; Morton D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 25615919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Accuracy of Implant Casts Generated with Conventional and Digital Impressions-An In Vitro Study.
    Ribeiro P; Herrero-Climent M; Díaz-Castro C; Ríos-Santos JV; Padrós R; Mur JG; Falcão C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Jul; 15(8):. PubMed ID: 30060540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Accuracy of a proposed implant impression technique using abutments and metal framework.
    Lee HJ; Lim YJ; Kim CW; Choi JH; Kim MJ
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2010 Mar; 2(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 21165184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Impression Techniques for Implant Restorations.
    Moura RV; Kojima AN; Saraceni CHC; Bassolli L; Balducci I; Özcan M; Mesquita AMM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e530-e535. PubMed ID: 29717518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Implant impression accuracy of parallel and non-parallel implants: a comparative in-vitro analysis of open and closed tray techniques.
    Osman MS; Ziada HM; Abubakr NH; Suliman AM
    Int J Implant Dent; 2019 Feb; 5(1):4. PubMed ID: 30778790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of implant connection length on the dimensional impression accuracy of inclined implants.
    Ehsani S; Siadat H; Alikhasi M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):e315-20. PubMed ID: 24278936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparative evaluation of impression accuracy of tilted and straight implants in All-on-Four technique.
    Ehsani S; Siadat H; Alikhasi M
    Implant Dent; 2014 Apr; 23(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 24614881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation.
    Hahn SM; Millstein PL; Kinnunen TH; Wright RF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations.
    Assuncao WG; Filho HG; Zaniquelli O
    Implant Dent; 2004 Dec; 13(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 15591998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effects of impression levels and trays on the accuracy of impressions taken from angulated implants.
    Geramipanah F; Sahebi M; Davari M; Hajimahmoudi M; Rakhshan V
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1098-105. PubMed ID: 24934081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Accuracy of impression techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Compagnoni MA; Molo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):715-21. PubMed ID: 20657866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review.
    Lee H; So JS; Hochstedler JL; Ercoli C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 18922257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Three-dimensional accuracy of a digitally coded healing abutment implant impression system.
    Ng SD; Tan KB; Teoh KH; Cheng AC; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):927-36. PubMed ID: 25032774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth.
    Giménez B; Özcan M; Martínez-Rus F; Pradíes G
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 17 Suppl 1():e54-64. PubMed ID: 23879869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Divergence correction associated with implant placement: a radiographic study.
    Mayer Y; Machtei EE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1033-9. PubMed ID: 20162106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions.
    Del'acqua MA; de Avila ÉD; Amaral ÂL; Pinelli LA; de Assis Mollo F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of Arch Size and Implant Angulations on the Accuracy of Implant Impressions.
    Mir Mohammad Rezaei S; Geramipanah F; Kamali H; Sadighpour L; Payaminia L
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 Nov; 29(4):218-222. PubMed ID: 33934578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of the accuracy of open-tray and snap-on impression techniques of implants with different angulations.
    Tafti AF; Hatami M; Razavi F; Ebadian B
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2019; 16(6):413-420. PubMed ID: 31803388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.