These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25749261)

  • 1. 30/60/10 Rule of effective performance planning.
    Cho JC; Armitstead JA
    J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2015; 55(2):120-2. PubMed ID: 25749261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Logjam in the regions.
    Tattam A
    Nurs Times; 1990 Aug 29-Sep 4; 86(35):43. PubMed ID: 2395711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Every which way you lose.
    Snell J
    Nurs Times; 1990 Aug 29-Sep 4; 86(35):42. PubMed ID: 2395710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The evaluation-notation].
    Mizrahi MR
    Soins Gynecol Obstet Pueric Pediatr; 1990; (109-110):30-6. PubMed ID: 2389233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review--why and how to do it.
    Jackson SA
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):60-86. PubMed ID: 2640603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating clinical competency in nursing.
    Lunde KF; Durbin-Lafferty E
    Nurs Manage; 1986 Aug; 17(8):47-50. PubMed ID: 3637728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preceptor pointers.
    Culleiton AL
    Nurs Manage; 2010 Nov; 41(11):40-5. PubMed ID: 21045626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Choosing a performance appraisal system.
    Grose LG
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):38-46. PubMed ID: 2640601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The annual human resource review (a career-planning system).
    Vosburgh RM
    Pers J; 1980 Oct; 59(10):830-7. PubMed ID: 10248748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Making performance appraisal work.
    Noble JE
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):21-8. PubMed ID: 2640598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Faculty status for clinician-educators: guidelines for evaluation and promotion.
    Jacobs MB
    Acad Med; 1993 Feb; 68(2):126-8. PubMed ID: 8431229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring and validating a nurse's caring performance.
    Smith LS
    Adv Clin Care; 1990; 5(3):14-6. PubMed ID: 2328068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective-focused approach for appraising the performance of institutional pharmacists.
    Coarse JF; Kubica AJ
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1979 Dec; 36(12):1676-82. PubMed ID: 525644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer review.
    Micheli AJ; Modest S
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1995 Jun; 30(2):197-210. PubMed ID: 7777403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A productivity triangle: three steps to good employee performance.
    Ryder JD
    Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1985 Aug; 7(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 10272338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Staying clear of the law.
    Boris LL
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):29-37. PubMed ID: 2640599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance appraisals that fit.
    Oliver JE
    Pers J; 1985 Jun; 64(6):66-71. PubMed ID: 10271647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Educators in action: evaluating performance.
    Hollander EC
    Tex Hosp; 1979 Jul; 35(2):48-9. PubMed ID: 10243343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rating managers' performance.
    Noll HE
    Multis; 1983 Mar; 1(1):34, 38-41. PubMed ID: 10258842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Participative employee evaluation.
    Breeden SA
    J Nurs Adm; 1978 May; 8(5):13-9. PubMed ID: 246911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.