377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25750138)
21. Comparison of conventional and automated breast volume ultrasound in the description and characterization of solid breast masses based on BI-RADS features.
Kim H; Cha JH; Oh HY; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Chae EY
Breast Cancer; 2014 Jul; 21(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 23086698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Detection of microcalcifications by high-resolution B-mode sonography in patients with BI-RADS 4a lesions].
Stöblen F; Landt S; Köninger A; Hecktor J; Kimmig R; Kümmel S
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2009; 49(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 20530944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Second-look US: how to find breast lesions with a suspicious MR imaging appearance.
Park VY; Kim MJ; Kim EK; Moon HJ
Radiographics; 2013; 33(5):1361-75. PubMed ID: 24025929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Results of MR imaging screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with lobular carcinoma in situ.
Friedlander LC; Roth SO; Gavenonis SC
Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):421-7. PubMed ID: 21900618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The role of second-look ultrasound of BIRADS-3 mammary lesions detected by breast MR imaging.
Fiaschetti V; Salimbeni C; Gaspari E; Dembele GK; Bolacchi F; Cossu E; Pistolese CA; Perretta T; Simonetti G
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3178-84. PubMed ID: 22417393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnostic value of breast ultrasound in mammography BI-RADS 0 and clinically indeterminate or suspicious of malignancy breast lesions.
Dobrosavljević A; Rakić S; Nikoli B; Raznatović SJ; Dikić SD; Milosević Z; Jurisić A; Skrobić M
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Mar; 73(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 27295907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. MR-directed ("Second-Look") ultrasound examination for breast lesions detected initially on MRI: MR and sonographic findings.
Abe H; Schmidt RA; Shah RN; Shimauchi A; Kulkarni K; Sennett CA; Newstead GM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):370-7. PubMed ID: 20093598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population?
Arazi-Kleinman T; Causer PA; Jong RA; Hill K; Warner E
Clin Radiol; 2009 Dec; 64(12):1166-74. PubMed ID: 19913125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Predictors of Invasive Breast Cancer in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy.
Shin YJ; Kim SM; Yun B; Jang M; Kim B; Lee SH
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Feb; 38(2):481-488. PubMed ID: 30069893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical Utility of Real-Time MR-Navigated Ultrasound with Supine Breast MRI for Suspicious Enhancing Lesions Not Identified on Second-Look Ultrasound.
Kang DK; Jung Y; Han S; Kim JY; Kim TH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 43(2):412-420. PubMed ID: 27780660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. MR is/is not a useful diagnostic tool for breast cancer management.
Van Goethem M; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; Parizel PM
Acta Chir Belg; 2007 Jun; 107(3):267-70. PubMed ID: 17685251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US.
LaTrenta LR; Menell JH; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Dershaw DD; Liberman L
Radiology; 2003 Jun; 227(3):856-61. PubMed ID: 12773685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Identification of occult breast lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging with targeted ultrasound: a prospective study.
Aracava MM; Chojniak R; Souza JA; Bitencourt AG; Marques EF
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Mar; 83(3):516-9. PubMed ID: 24440492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI.
Sakamoto N; Tozaki M; Higa K; Tsunoda Y; Ogawa T; Abe S; Ozaki S; Sakamoto M; Tsuruhara T; Kawano N; Suzuki T; Yamashiro N; Fukuma E
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 18224381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reliability and validity of needle biopsy evaluation of breast-abnormalities using the B-categorization--design and objectives of the Diagnosis Optimisation Study (DIOS).
Kluttig A; Trocchi P; Heinig A; Holzhausen HJ; Taege C; Hauptmann S; Boecker W; Decker T; Loening T; Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A; Thomssen C; Lantzsch T; Buchmann J; Stang A
BMC Cancer; 2007 Jun; 7():100. PubMed ID: 17570833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: is it an essential technique?
Tozaki M; Yamashiro N; Suzuki T; Kawano N; Ozaki S; Sakamoto N; Abe S; Ogawa T; Katayama N; Tsunoda Y; Fukuma E
Breast Cancer; 2009; 16(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 18807122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.
Heinig J; Witteler R; Schmitz R; Kiesel L; Steinhard J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Sonographic criteria for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions using real-time spatial compound imaging in combination with XRES adaptive image processing].
Hahn M; Roessner L; Krainick-Strobel U; Gruber IV; Krämer B; Gall C; Siegmann KC; Wallwiener D; Kagan KO
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 20614412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Does Initial Imaging Modality Affect Breast Biopsy Upgrade Rates? A Single Institution Review.
Scott RB; Dolkar T; Vidhun R; Osler T; Staradub VL
Conn Med; 2016; 80(6):335-40. PubMed ID: 27509639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
