170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25750629)
1. Endogenous attention modulates attentional and motor interference from distractors: evidence from behavioral and electrophysiological results.
Martín-Arévalo E; Lupiáñez J; Botta F; Chica AB
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():132. PubMed ID: 25750629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of abrupt-onset and color singleton distractors: Evidence from event-related potential studies.
Chen X; Xu B; Chen Y; Zeng X; Zhang Y; Fu S
Psychophysiology; 2023 Aug; 60(8):e14290. PubMed ID: 36946491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrophysiological evidence of low salience distractor interference during visual search.
Fortier-Gauthier U; Jolicœur P
Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13068. PubMed ID: 29423999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preserved Suppression of Salient Irrelevant Stimuli During Visual Search in Age-Associated Memory Impairment.
Lorenzo-López L; Maseda A; Buján A; de Labra C; Amenedo E; Millán-Calenti JC
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():2033. PubMed ID: 26793148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Irrelevant sights and sounds require spatial suppression: ERP evidence.
Lunn J; Berggren N; Ward J; Forster S
Psychophysiology; 2023 Mar; 60(3):e14181. PubMed ID: 36114739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Little engagement of attention by salient distractors defined in a different dimension or modality to the visual search target.
Tsai SY; Nasemann J; Qiu N; Töllner T; Müller HJ; Shi Z
Psychophysiology; 2023 Dec; 60(12):e14375. PubMed ID: 37417320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single dose testosterone administration modulates the temporal dynamics of distractor processing.
Fang H; Li X; Wu Y; Peng W
Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2020 Nov; 121():104838. PubMed ID: 32871336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance-dependent reward hurts performance: The non-monotonic attentional load modulation on task-irrelevant distractor processing.
He X; Liu W; Qin N; Lyu L; Dong X; Bao M
Psychophysiology; 2021 Dec; 58(12):e13920. PubMed ID: 34383329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Salient-but-irrelevant stimuli cause attentional capture in difficult, but attentional suppression in easy visual search.
Barras C; Kerzel D
Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1826-1838. PubMed ID: 28752665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrophysiological evidence for attentional capture by irrelevant angry facial expressions.
Burra N; Barras C; Coll SY; Kerzel D
Biol Psychol; 2016 Oct; 120():69-80. PubMed ID: 27568328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrophysiological evidence for attentional capture by irrelevant angry facial expressions: Naturalistic faces.
Burra N; Coll SY; Barras C; Kerzel D
Neurosci Lett; 2017 Jan; 637():44-49. PubMed ID: 27899310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biased Competition between Targets and Distractors Reduces Attentional Suppression: Evidence from the Positivity Posterior Contralateral and Distractor Positivity.
Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Aug; 34(9):1563-1575. PubMed ID: 35640105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interference of irrelevant information in multisensory selection depends on attentional set.
Jensen A; Merz S; Spence C; Frings C
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1176-1195. PubMed ID: 31444699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Event-related potentials of food-induced blindness in the rapid serial visual presentation paradigm.
Kirsten H; Seib-Pfeifer LE; Schmuck J; Gibbons H
Appetite; 2023 Jan; 180():106344. PubMed ID: 36240947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of relevant and irrelevant stereoscopic depth cues: Depth information does not always capture attention.
Plewan T; Rinkenauer G
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):1996-2007. PubMed ID: 30030691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term (statistically learnt) and short-term (inter-trial) distractor-location effects arise at different pre- and post-selective processing stages.
Qiu N; Zhang B; Allenmark F; Nasemann J; Tsai SY; Müller HJ; Shi Z
Psychophysiology; 2023 Oct; 60(10):e14351. PubMed ID: 37277926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intertrial priming due to distractor repetition is eliminated in homogeneous contexts.
Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1935-47. PubMed ID: 27165171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.
Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A
Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
